Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
5 pages/β‰ˆ1375 words
Sources:
4 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Health, Medicine, Nursing
Type:
Research Paper
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 29.16
Topic:

Evidence-Based Project: Critical Appraisal of Research

Research Paper Instructions:

Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 3: Critical Appraisal of Research
Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals—conducted using appraisal tools—to assign market values to houses and other properties. These values are then presented to buyers and sellers to set prices and initiate offers.
Research appraisal is not that different. The critical appraisal process utilizes formal appraisal tools to assess the results of research to determine value to the context at hand. Evidence-based practitioners often present these findings to make the case for specific courses of action.
In this Assignment, you will use an appraisal tool to conduct a critical appraisal of published research. You will then present the results of your efforts.
To Prepare:
• Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and the four systematic reviews (or other filtered high- level evidence) you selected in Module 3.
• Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and analyzed in Module 3.
• Review and download the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template provided in the Resources.
The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)
Part 3A: Critical Appraisal of Research
Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected by completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Choose a total of four peer- reviewed articles that you selected related to your clinical topic of interest in Module 2 and Module 3.
Note: You can choose any combination of articles from Modules 2 and 3 for your Critical Appraisal. For example, you may choose two unfiltered research articles from Module 2 and two filtered research articles (systematic reviews) from Module 3 or one article from Module 2 and three articles from Module 3. You can choose any combination of articles from the prior Module Assignments as long as both modules and types of studies are represented.
Part 3B: Critical Appraisal of Research
Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.

Research Paper Sample Content Preview:

EBP: Critical Appraisal of Research
Student Name
Department, University
Course Code: Course Title
Professor’s Name
Due Date
EBP: Critical Appraisal of Research
Evidence-Based Project, Part 3A: Critical Appraisal of Research
Full APA formatted citation of selected article.

Article #1

Article #2

Article #3

Article #4


Koyama, A. K., Cheng, Y. J., Brinks, R., Xie, H., Gregg, E. W., Hoyer, A., ... & Imperatore, G. (2022). Trends in lifetime risk and years of potential life lost from diabetes in the United States, 1997–2018. PloS one, 17(5), e0268805. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268805

Boels, A. M., Vos, R. C., Dijkhorst-Oei, L. T., & Rutten, G. E. (2019). Effectiveness of diabetes self-management education and support via a smartphone application in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: results of a randomized controlled trial (TRIGGER study). BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care, 7(1), e000981. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000981

Peña-Purcell, N., Han, G., Lee Smith, M., Peterson, R., & Ory, M. G. (2019). Impact of diabetes self-management education on psychological distress and health outcomes among African Americans and Hispanics/Latinos with diabetes. Diabetes Spectrum, 32(4), 368-377. https://doi.org/10.2337/ds18-0081

Ahn, E., & Kang, H. (2018). Introduction to systematic review and meta-analysis. Korean Journal of anesthesiology, 71(2), 103-112. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2018.71.2.103

Evidence Level *
(I, II, or III)

Level II: Focuses on a randomized experiment where all group members are subjected to similar diagnoses and treatment. Members from a particular group had all their results recorded separately.

Level I: A critical analysis of individuals only with type 2 diabetes on insulin therapy.

Level V: A critical analysis of qualitative studies of individuals with specific trends (psychological distress, self-efficacy, self-care, and diabetes knowledge.

Level III: Non-experiment systematic reviews and meta-analysis

Conceptual Framework
Describe the theoretical basis for the study (If there is not one mentioned in the article, say that here).**

To investigate the effects of burden-lifetime risk (LR), years of potential life lost (YPLL), and time spent with diabetes to assess the extent of mortality and diabetes incidences.

There is a decreased knowledge of the self-education program for most patients with diabetes. The study aims to observe the impact of support smartphones on insulin therapy for people with diabetes (type 2).

Dependent variables in the statistical analysis conceptual framework were demographics, while independent variables were psychological score outcomes and distress.

Research on bias and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis in anesthesiology.

Design/Method
Describe the design and how the study was carried out (In detail, including inclusion/exclusion criteria).

Primary research which obtained data from the National Health Interview Survey

Use of multicenter parallel randomized controlled super-tria...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Research Paper Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!
Order Now