Patient Advocacy and Autonomy: Belmont Report Ethical Principles

Belmont Report
Name:
Institution:
Course Code:
Date:
Description of Belmont Report Ethical Principles
Respect for persons
This principle is pegged on the presumption that all people have the autonomy to do their own decisions. The Belmont report defines ‘respect autonomy as to give weight to autonomous persons' considered opinions and choices while refraining from obstructing their actions unless they are clearly detrimental to others.’ Hence, anyone who voluntarily enters into research as a subject is entitled to autonomy to make his/her own decisions especially on whether to participate in the research or not. in the event that the subject is incapable of self-determination, a legal representative assumes the role of self-autonomy. The capacity of self-determination can be affected by illnesses, genetic conditions, age, etc. and therefore a legal representative assumes the responsibility to make autonomous decisions on the behalf of the subject.
Beneficence
CITATION Mue06 \l 1033 (Mueller & Hook, 2006) defines beneficence as ‘the principle of beneficence requires that investigators act to secure the well-being of human research subjects, maximize benefits and minimize risks and harm.’ The two main rules of this principle are; do not harm and should be aimed to maximize possible benefits and minimize possible harms. Since it is nearly impossible to determine that the subject may not be harmed, there is a grey area in this principle and it is fairly subjective in that the researcher weighs the possible risks to ascertain whether the subject will be harmed. The researchers have to determine when benefits should be foregone because of risks and when benefits should be sought despite the risks.
Justice
The principle of justice refers to the equitable distribution of the benefits and burdens of research. The general idea of justice is the fairness of distribution. No one should have unfair advantage because of his/her societal status and neither should anyone with low societal ranking be subjected to unfair terms or procedures because he/she cannot afford the advantage or innovations of a research study. Thus, the selection of subjects must be fair and that no class of people should be unfairly targeted or manipulated for their availability or compromised availability rather than for reasons directly related to the problem being studied.
The Nuremberg code & Helsinki Declaration
During World War II, the Nazi Germany government used unethical approaches to human medical exploration. The tyrannical government of Nazi Germany targeted specific pool of people who were coerced to agree to participate in some scientific experiments. The selection process was subjective and was inclined towards advancing the eugenic practices of the Nazi Germany government to create a master race, the Aryan race CITATION His17 \l 1033 (History.com, 2017). During this time, the medical explorations targeted mainly the mentally sick, people living with physical disabilities, specific ethnicities, etc. the experiments had nothing to do with the background of these people, rather, the Nazi Germany government targeted them because they were vulnerable and lacked equal protection of rights as other...