Annotated Bibliography: Genetic Modification

Name: Professor’s Name: Course: Due Date: Annotated Bibliography: Genetic Modification This annotated bibliography presents the sources that will be used to develop the essay on the issue of gene modification. All the sources are credible, which enables them to be reliable sources for the paper. The sources offer different perspectives on the issue to enable the author to present a balanced perspective on gene modification. Baylis, Françoise, and Marcus McLeod. "First-in-human phase 1 CRISPR gene editing cancer trials: are we ready?." Current gene therapy 17.4 (2017): 309-319. In this article, the authors justify the need for gene editing. The authors support their position by indicating how gene modification could be critical in eliminating conditions like melanoma, synovial sarcoma, and multiple myeloma. I would use the article to justify the need for genetic modification in the control of diseases. The article is credible because the authors have undertaken extensive research to make their claims on the issue. It also offers insights to determine when it is ethically acceptable to conduct such trials depending on the safety and efficacy data from pre-clinical studies. Harris, John. Pro and Con: Should Gene Editing Be Performed on Human Embryos? 2019. </magazine/2016/08/human-gene-editing-pro-con-opinions/ The article from National Geographic offers a comprehensive analysis of the benefits and disadvantages of gene editing. Here, John Harris presents both sides of the debate to enable the reader to make an informed decision regarding the issue of genetic editing in humans. The strength of the article is its analysis of scientific evidence as well as current events. The article will be useful in presenting a balanced view of the controversial issue. Hendriks, S., et al. "Reasons for being in favour of or against genome modification: a survey of the Dutch general public." Human Reproduction Open 2018.3 (2018): hoy008. This article presents the general public’s reasons for supporting and against the use of genome modification. It includes the results of a cross-sectional survey that was done online among the Dutch general public. All four authors are credible and work with recognized universities. The strength of this article is the fact that it highlights both points in favor of or against the use of genome modification, which will allow me to explore the topic comprehensively. The ...