Combining Development and Work

Consider the following: "Combining development and work makes even more sense if you believe the long-accepted maxim that there is a 70/20/10 formula that applies to leadership development. (That formula suggests that 70% of what you learn about leadership comes from on-the-job experiences. Coaching from your boss and others gives you the next 20% and the final 10% comes from formal classroom development.)
While those exact numbers can be debated, most would say it is directionally correct. Why, then, do organizations spend virtually no time trying to gain a higher return from the 70%, a minimal effort on the 20%, and focus most of their resources on the 10%?
After reviewing the background reading about the 70/20/10 formula of leadership development, answer the 4 questions below Within your post, support your responses with information from the background materials or reputable outside sources and provide the full citation at the end. Use APA format for your references. Bring in your own personal experiences, readings, and research, where applicable.
1.Discuss a time when you saw the 70/20/10 formula of leadership development in action. Do you agree that these are the correct percentages? If not, what is a more realistic breakdown?
2.What is the biggest problem you see with the 70/20/10 formula?
3.If you could reapportion the percentages as they should be instead of as they are, how would you weight the formula? For example, if the classroom portion should be 25%, where do you remove the extra 15% so it all still adds up to 100%?
4.Where in the 70/20/10 formula do you think coaching is most present? Where should it be?
Erdös, T., & Ramseyer, F. T. (2021). Change process in coaching: Interplay of nonverbal synchrony, working alliance, self-regulation, and goal attainment. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(June), 1-23. https://doi(dot)org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.580351