Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
2 pages/β‰ˆ550 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
APA
Subject:
Management
Type:
Other (Not Listed)
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 10.44
Topic:

Argument and Evidence. Overview of the Academic Essay

Other (Not Listed) Instructions:

Read the two papers listed below found in the Keiser University On-Line library. For each article use Checklist questions 5-8 to identify, explain and discuss the argument and evidence the authors present in these papers. Remember, the question is not whether you liked the articles, but whether the authors developed a well supported logical case for their theses.
(In Ebscohost Database) - Deriving the Engel Curve: Pierre Bourdieu and the Social Critique of Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
Andrew B. Trigg
The Open University

(In Proquest Database) - Enhancing Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs for Effective Leadership
Bina Soni, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Ramesh Soni, Indiana University of Pennsylvania
Argument - The Writing Center at UNC-Chapel Hill - Argument
writingcenter.unc.edu/handouts/argument/

Argument
https://owl(dot)english(dot)purdue(dot)edu/owl/resource/724/01/

Overview of the Academic Essay
Copyright 1998, Kathy Duffin, for the Writing Center at Harvard University
http://writingcenter(dot)fas(dot)harvard(dot)edu/pages/overview-academic-essay

The Writing Center at UNC-Chapel Hill - Evidence
writingcenter.unc.edu/handouts/evidence/

Integrating Evidence into Your Writing
This handout was adapted from How to Use Evidence, a pamphlet developed by Indiana University’s Writing Tutorial Services (2004). That pamphlet is available at www(dot)indiana(dot)edu/~wts/pamphlets.shtml
5. Strategies of Development.
Is the paper logically organized into separate sections with headings that represent the major and minor points of the argument?
Are the sections of the paper organized into a logical sequence which supports the thesis statement?
What strategies of development do you see the author using on the paragraph level or in the paper as a whole? Which are the most successful?
6. Development of Ideas.
Are the main points of the paper sufficiently developed?
Does the paper bring up any interesting points that you would like to see developed further?
Do you find any spots where the paper goes off on a tangent or addresses peripheral/irrelevant material?
Are there any places where the author relies too heavily on generalization?
7. Organization of the Argument.
Is the argument organized effectively?
Do the ideas follow each other in a logical, understandable way?
Are there any places that are confusing?
Is the argument based upon valid evidence such as peer-reviewed journal articles or opinion?
What strategies of development do you see the author using on the paragraph level? Which are the most successful?
8. Definitions.
Are all the terms well defined based upon an appropriate number of valid sources?
Terms that have generally accepted meanings in everyday language need to have precise definitions when used in scholarly writing. Identify the terms used in the paper that are well defined, and those that need better definitions.

Other (Not Listed) Sample Content Preview:

Argument and Evidence
Author`s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Argument and Evidence
Question 5
The two articles have proper strategies of development because they are organized into a specific section for an easy understanding of the audience or the reader. However, the article “Enhancing Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs for Effective Leadership” has a better strategy as compared to “Deriving the Engel Curve: Pierre Bourdieu and the Social Critique of Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs.” Trigg`s article has a little breakdown, which can be challenging to the readers as they have to be keen to understand his message. The article of Trigg consists of the three sections that include the introduction, second part entailing discussion of the problems on the human wants, and the social critique part. On the contrary, the article of Soni et al. presents the best approach that can persuade the readers on wanting to read more to understand various aspects of human needs (Soni & Soni, 2016). It has the proper separation of basic needs that are essential to less significant to daily human survival. Therefore, the logic in the two articles is useful that traps the attention of the reader towards understanding the concepts of human needs.
Question 6
The articles have a correct approach to developing ideas on the needs of human beings. For instance, the items highlight the wants humans require for health, protection, stability, balance, and comfort. It gives prose for the primary desires to secondary wants that humans depend on for survival as well as for pleasure. Primary wants include food needs and basic needs, which humans cannot do without them. However, they also present the secondary wants that humans can live without them, such as jewelry and social needs. Soni et al. article a clear flow of ideas that support humans' survival. The paper is interesting, and the two articles need to focus further on social interactions as they have much actualization of the individual self. In my view, the paper is relevant to the tangent as it outlines and explains humans` needs for survival. The authors also use some generalization principles on the family level of expenditure. The articles have to show which humans needs can satisfy with low-income revenues. Besides, they should show the difference in the level of income, leading to human prioritizing some essential...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Other (Not Listed) Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!
Order Now