Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
4 pages/≈1100 words
Sources:
1 Source
Style:
APA
Subject:
Health, Medicine, Nursing
Type:
Article Critique
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 17.28
Topic:

Pelvic Training and Sexual Function

Article Critique Instructions:

Journal Article Critique Instructions
General Instructions
You will be summarizing and critiquing (1000 word minimum or about 4 pages double-spaced, font 12 Times New Roman) a peer reviewed journal article related to the Modules in the course. The article you choose must report the results of a research experiment (or correlational study), not more than 5 years old. The article cannot be a review article, where the authors simply summarize findings by others, or an opinion paper. The article you choose must have sections similar to “Methods”, “Results”, and “Discussion/Conclusion” and must come from a professional peer reviewed journal; it may be in the health sciences, medicine, or psychology/sociology databases. Law reviews are not appropriate for this assignment.
Acceptable Professional Journals:
To be used for this assignment it must be from a peer-reviewed journal. Some examples follow:
American Journal of Public Health
Journal of Sex Research
JAMA
Family Life Educator
New England Journal of Medicine
Journal of Social Work
Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy
Journal of Social Issues
Family Relations
Health Education Quarterly
Journal of Homosexuality
Human Reproduction
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Journal of Sex Education & Therapy
Modules of your Critique
1. Introduction and statement of purpose (1 paragraph
· Include an opening sentence that announces the author(s) and the title, and the topic of the article.
· Briefly describe what the study was about; however, avoid getting into too much detail. Subsequent sections will be used to address further details about the study.
· What was the author’s or authors’ general purpose for carrying out this study? Keep in mind there may be more than one purpose.
· Conclude your introduction with a brief statement of your evaluation of the article. This can be a positive or negative evaluation or, as is usually the case, a mixed response.
2. Theoretical assumptions and Thesis/Hypothesis (from the introduction/literature review)
· Briefly describe the theoretical assumption(s) associated with the proposed thesis/hypothesis.
· What is the thesis/hypothesis provided?
3. Methods
· Relatively briefly, but thoroughly, describe the main aspects of the study methodology.
· Be sure to include information regarding; the study design, participants, variables of interest (i.e., independent, dependent, and other showcased variables), data collection process (i.e., what was the timeframe of the data collection, what data collection instruments were used, were the instruments reliable and valid, what was done with the data?) and operational definitions of key terms if necessary.
4. Results
· What were the major findings of the study, especially in relation to the thesis/hypothesis?
· Was the hypothesis supported or not supported?
· What other important statistical relationships were found?
5. Assessment of the study and limitations
· What were the stated limitations of the study? Be sure to clearly identify what was the author(s) view of study limitations versus your opinion.
· What was your impression of how the author(s) conducted the study?
· Did the methodology seem appropriate? Whether your answer is “yes” or “no”; be sure to justify your answer. Could the study design have been improved? Is there anything you would have done differently?
· Did the study address different ethnic groups, religions, genders, sexual orientations? Remember it is appropriate to investigate a particular group to help design appropriate interventions. Not every study should address everyone, but did the study address those it should for its stated purpose?
· Remember 1 study doesn’t equal proof of fact but rather may provide support.
6. Relationship to human sexuality
· How did the article affect your knowledge and thinking about human sexuality?
· Did your opinion change on any topic?
7. Coclusions & Recommendations for public health practice/health education or public policy
· Did the research convince you that we should change health practice, education or policy?
· Do you feel this topic should be investigated further? What type of study should be done?
Submit a copy of the article to the digital drop box. It may be HTML, PDF or JPEG.

Article Critique Sample Content Preview:

Article Critique: Pelvic Training and Sexual Function
Name
University
Course
Professor
Due Date
Article Critique: Pelvic Training and Sexual Function
The article “Pelvic floor muscle training effect in sexual function in postmenopausal women: A randomized controlled trial,” features a study conducted by Franco et al. (2021) to investigate the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training as a potential approach to improving sexual function in women after menopause. To this end, the researchers wanted to investigate the extent to which pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) can be reliably used for addressing sexual dysfunction in post-menopausal women. Franco et al. (2020, p. 1236) were interested in determining the effectiveness of PFMT on sexual function among postmenopausal women as well as investigating whether the protocol influenced the function of the pelvic floor muscle. While the study had limitations, the researchers sparked my interest in the importance of evidence-based research in human sexuality as a field.
Theoretical Assumptions and Thesis/Hypothesis
Researchers in the study operate under the theoretical assumption that the potential improvement in the strength, relaxation and endurance of pelvic floor muscles could provide a potential approach for improving sexual functions among postmenopausal women (Franco et al., 2021, p. 1237). To this end, pelvic floor muscle training was advanced as a theoretically sound protocol that could be used to investigate the hypothesis. The rationale for using PMFT as the protocol is based on findings from past studies that recommend the protocol as a first line of treatment for various conditions associated with pelvic floor dysfunctions such as urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Past research also provides evidence indicating that PMFT is effective in promoting motor control of the pelvic floor muscles (Franco et al., 2021, p. 1237). Notably, the researchers do not provide an explicit hypothesis or a thesis statement that will inform the study. Rather, they state the primary aims and the secondary aim that will be investigated in the research paper.
Methods
The research design for the study is a randomized controlled trial, with the participants assigned either to a control group that featured no intervention or an interventional group where the participants were subjected to supervised PFMT that they could also accomplish at home (Franco et al., 2021, p. 1237). The total study had 77 participants, of which 37 were assigned to the control group while 40 of them were assigned to the intervention group. The final analysis included 29 in the control group and 34 in the intervention group (Franco et al., 2021, p. 1238). The dependent variables for the study were sexual function and pelvic floor muscles (PFM) function, while the independent variable was the administration of the PMFT protocol (Franco et al., 2021, p. 1237). Data on sexual function were collected using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), while the PFM function was collected using digital palpitation (Franco et al., 2021, p. 1237). The data collection methods were valid and reliable. Descriptive statistics of the collected data were first completed with the comparison...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Article Critique Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!
Order Now