Men's Experiences and Awareness on Breastfeeding, and Their Future Ideas on its Education
Qualitative Outline Questions Box 10.1 Guidelines for Critically Appraising Qualitative Designs 1. Was the research tradition for the qualitative study identified? If none was identified, can one be inferred? 2. Is the research question congruent with a specific research tradition? Are the data sources and research methods congruent with the research tradition? 3. How well was the research design described? Are design decisions explained and justified? Does it appear that the design emerged during data collection, allowing researchers to capitalize on early information? 4. Did the design lend itself to a thorough, in-depth examination of the focal phe-nomenon? Was there evidence of reflexivity? What design elements might have strengthened the study (e.g., a longitudinal perspective rather than a cross-sectional one)? 5. Was the study undertaken with an ideological perspective? If so, is there evidence that ideological goals were achieved (e.g., Was there full collaboration between re-searchers and participants? Did the research have the power to be transformativern Box 11.1 Guidelines for Critically Appraising Qualitative Sampling Plans 1. Was the setting appropriate for addressing the research question, and was it adequately described? 2. What type of sampling strategy was used? 3. Were the eligibility criteria for the study specified? How were participants recruited into the study? 4. Given the information needs of the study—and, if applicable, its qualitative tradition—was the sampling approach effective? S. Was the sample size adequate and appropriate? Did the researcher indicate that saturation had been achieved? Do the findings suggest a richly textured and comprehensive set of data without any apparent 'holes' or thin areas? 6. Were key characteristics of the sample described (e.g., age, gender)? Was a rich description of participants and context provided, allowing for an assessment of the transferability of the findings? Box 11.2 Guidelines for Critically Appraising Data Collecdon Methods In Qualitative Studies 1. Given the research question and the characteristics of study part Kapants, did the researcher use the best method of capturing study phenomena (i.e.. sellrepons. observation)? Should supplementary methods have boon used to enrich the data available for analysts? 2. If self-report methods were used, did the researcher make good decisions about the specific method used to solicit information (e.g.. unstructured interviews, torus group interviews, and so 3. If a topic guide was used, did the report present examples of specific questions? Did the wording of questions encourage net responses? 4. Were interviews recorded and transcribed? If interviews were not recorded, what steps were taken to ensure data accuracy? 5. II observational methods were used, did the report adequately describe what the observations entailed? What did the researcher actually observe, In what types of setting did the observations occur, and how often and over how long a period were observations made? 6. What role did the researcher assume in terms Of being an observer and a panics, panty Was this role appropriate? 7. How were observational data recorded? Did the recording method maximize data quality?
A Research Paper Critique
Author's Name:
Affiliated Institution:
Course Code:
Submission Date:
A Research Paper Critique
Introduction
According to Polit and Beck (2010), researchers give their studies information in several ways. The most common categories of study reports are provided as journal articles, dissertations, conference presentations, and books. These authors also state that an excellent research journal article can be qualitative or quantitative. Fathers' experiences of supporting breastfeeding: challenges for breastfeeding promotion and education is a research journal article written by Amy Brown and Ruth Davies in 2014. The main aim of writing this journal was to examine the experiences men have on breastfeeding, the information and support they received, and their future ideas on breastfeeding promotion and education. The research article results indicate that fathers support breastfeeding and desire to help their partners all ways in this process. Despite the researchers coming up with significant results from the study, their reliability and validity are questionable.
Abstract Review
The paper's abstract, in particular, reflects the entire article and is in the proper format. The abstract begins with a backdrop of the research article, allowing the reader to grasp what the paper will include. The abstract states the study's key objectives and the methodology employed. It also highlights the data analysis tools used and summarizes the discussion and results of the article. The conclusions of the study report clearly illustrate the fathers' experience of supporting breastfeeding and the challenges for breastfeeding promotion and education. The word count in the abstract is correct (235 words), and it should be within the range of 150 and 250 words (Polit & Beck, 2010). Despite its briefness, it covers all of the essential components of the study report.
Summary of the Article
Overall, the data revealed that men embrace breastfeeding and desire to help their partners. The findings revealed that males frequently felt excluded from nursing interactions and unable to support their partners during this period. Many women said they were left out of prenatal breastfeeding classes or felt irrelevant in postpartum assistance. Men desired more knowledge on nursing and suggestions for how they might help their partners in the real world. The findings underscore the necessity of health professionals providing assistance and information to dads and the mother-infant dyad to promote and enable breastfeeding.
Introduction Review
The authors write the introduction that misses the prior longitudinal studies and does not show consistent results on the father's breastfeeding support experience. The author also had no idea of delving deeper into this subject and observing the difficulties of breastfeeding promotion and education. Reading through the introductory portion of the paper, one cannot easily understand a clear problem statement stated from the first to the last paragraph of the section. The critique to this section is that reader cannot distinguish the introduction and literature review. On the other hand, the writers concentrated on solving several research questions. First and foremost,...
👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Article Critique Samples:
- Integrating the primary health care1 page/≈275 words | 1 Source | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Article Critique |
- Meanings That Youth Associate With Healthy and Unhealthy Food 4 pages/≈1100 words | No Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Article Critique |
- Dealing with end of life—New graduated nurse experiences3 pages/≈825 words | 2 Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Article Critique |
- Explanation of Factors of Mental Health Doctors Responses to Mental Illness2 pages/≈550 words | 3 Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Article Critique |
- Original Article: Risk Factors For New Accidental 3 pages/≈825 words | 3 Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Article Critique |
- Research Article Appraisal Representative Population9 pages/≈2475 words | No Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Article Critique |
- Critical appraisal qualitative Health, Medicine Article Critique4 pages/≈1100 words | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Article Critique |