Implications/Themes Identified by Norton: Sex had Two Possible Determinants

Please Read Below
The case of T. Hall provides some pretty incredible insight into the early years of the Virginia Colony. Please note that the evidence suggests that Hall was intersex, meaning Hall had BOTH male and female anatomy. Because Hall was not singularly male or female, the community did not know how to categorize someone who was not easily categorizable. The way that they dealt with this situation shows us what they valued in their society--and who was involved in problem-solving. It is important that we avoid modern associations or phraseology here. This is an examination of a court case in the past, and the goal is to use it to understand people of the past. The point is not to judge them by our standards (because they would almost certainly fall short), but to try to make sense of how they understood and ordered their own world. Chances are we won't agree with the way the case was handled, but judgment and opinions are not the focus here. Rather, I want you to think about what this case and the actions of the people involved in it reveal about their world.
Choose three of the implications listed below that were identified by Norton in the article and explain in complete sentences what the case of T. Hall revealed. For clarity, please create a separate paragraph with the implication listed for each of the three that you choose to describe.
Implications/Themes identified by Norton
1. Sex had two possible determinants
2. Importance of clothing
3. Lack of personal privacy
4. Role of the community- and women- in the process
5. “To get a bitt for my catt” Issue of sexuality
6. The Court’s decision