Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
1 page/≈275 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
Other
Subject:
Literature & Language
Type:
Other (Not Listed)
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 3.6
Topic:

Deductive Arguments on ASARCO Activities and EL Paso Soil Study

Other (Not Listed) Instructions:

Directions
1) Idendify the argument or arguments in the ASARCO document and put it/them into standard form.
2) Say whether the argument or arguments are either deductive, inductive, or both. If they are deductive, make a judgment regarding whether the argument or arguments are valid or sound. If they are inductive, make a judgement regarding whether the argument or arguments are weak, strong, or cogent.
3) Comment on the strengths and weaknesses (I am not necessarily referring to the inductive judgments “weak” and “strong” in 2) above) of the argument/arguments: Where do they go right? Where do they go wrong?
Formatting
This is a typed document. Follow these formatting instructions where they apply:
https://learning(dot)hccs(dot)edu/faculty/daniel.flores1/paper-formatting-instructions/PAPER%20FORMATTING%20GUIDELINES.pdf/view

Other (Not Listed) Sample Content Preview:
Deductive Argument in Understanding the ASARCO-EL Paso Soil Study
The article, Understanding the ASARCO-EL Paso Soil Study, posits that there is a connection between the smelting activities of ASARCO and soil contamination in EL Paso. The article reports on a study conducted by chemist Michael E. Ketterer who established that soil samples from nearby communities were consistent with pollution from ASARCO’s smelting activities. The purpose of the current paper is to show whether articles take a deductive, inductive or both approaches to argument. The article adopts a deductive approach to argument in communicating the message for several reasons.
A deductive argument begins with a hypothesis, and explores the possibilities of reaching a specific and logical conclusion (Salkind, 2010). In the article, the hypothesis is that there is a connection between smelting activities and soil pollution in nearby cities. The hypothesis can only be true if the premises and conclusion are true. Therefore, to prove the connection between smelting and soil pollution, the authors use logical steps towards experimental outcomes. In this case, a deductive argument is valid because if the premises are ...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to pollution:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!
Order Now