Literature Reviews, Paraphrasing and Synthesizing Paper

Literature Reviews, Paraphrasing and Synthesizing
Student’s Name:
Institutional Affiliation:
Date:

Literature Reviews, Paraphrasing and Synthesizing
According to Gasparyan, Ayvazyan, Blackmore, and Kitas (2011) on their research about; writing a narrative biomedical review: Considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors; reviewing articles widely cover a particular topic are vital for effective study and academic works. Many editors think through review journals for distinctive and regular matters of articles. Literature review writing needs profound information and understanding incorporated together. The authors analyzed the major stages in writing a report biomedical review and reflected on points that should be considered to make a project success. The authors accomplished an all-inclusive examination using MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE and Web of Science addressing topics such as literature review writing standards, narrative review, title, abstract, composition, principles, peer review, study methods, and scientific writing standards. Views articulated in the review are also grounded on individual involvement as authors and peer reviewers.
Wakefield (2015) examined synthesizing the review of the literature. In placing the procedure of synthesizing the study literature into context, the paper explored the evaluating procedure by simplifying them into seven successive phases. The article explained how and why these stages must to be maintained and implemented if a robust complete literature examination and investigation are to be attained. The authors further outlined how scholars can engage in the evaluating procedure and described how the review of the literature must to be collected to produce a reasonable and coherent discussion to scrutinize a subject of concern or study in more detail.
According to Nwanzu, and Mbanefo (2017), on their research on the topic review of literature in degree-driven study project: a call for desired level of attention, literature review does not have the consideration it merits in degree-driven study projects, and that the purpose for this is that its significance in the whole study project is not obvious to investigators and other participants. The authors carried out a description on the significance of the review of the literature section of degree-driven study project. The authors covered four parts that addressed the idea, the procedure, significance of review of literature and recommendation. The authors explained that academic study projects for degree are frequently accepted in five parts. Every of the sections makes numerous aids to the producing of the whole investigation work. Nevertheless, although some of the sections and their fundamentals have involved the essential concern from text authors, professors and learners, some other chapters did not have the consideration merited. Amongst the last group is the literature review chapter, typically Chapter Two. The review of the Literature is a word that denotes to "the assortment of accessible published and unpublished documents on a specific tropic that comprise of statistics, knowledge, dat...