Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
2 pages/β‰ˆ550 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
APA
Subject:
Management
Type:
Other (Not Listed)
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 10.44
Topic:

The Peer Review Management Research Paper Coursework

Other (Not Listed) Instructions:

Peer Review - As scholars, we rely on each other to refine and perfect our work. Using the Peer-Review Checklist in “Start Here,” critique the peer’s paper emailed to you by your professor. Provide additional recommendations that will eliminate errors and strengthen your classmates’ work. Post your checklist with comments as a new thread with the Author’s name in the subject line. Please be friendly, professional, and positive in your comments. Be honest, your classmates’ are counting on it.
PEER REVIEW FORM
Answer the questions briefly but specifically – please use a different font or color that makes your comments easily identifiable by the author you are reviewing. When you have finished filling out the form, post it to the discussion thread.
Name of Peer reviewer:
Name of paper author:
Paper title:
1. Thesis.
Copy and paste the thesis of the paper below. If you can’t find it briefly describe what you think it might be.
Does it clearly state the writer’s purpose for the paper?
Does it set the stage for the remainder of the paper?
How could it be improved in terms of stating the writer’s position or point-of-view?
Where is the thesis statement in the paper ... at the beginning? at the end? Is this positioning effective in terms of preparing the reader for what is to follow?
2. Introduction:
Does the introduction provide some general background regarding the topic of the paper?
Does the introduction make you want to keep reading? Why or why not?
By the end of the introduction do you know the purpose of the paper and how the author intends to address that purpose?
3. Introduction: Follow-through.
Having read the rest of the paper, did you find that the introduction gave you a good idea of what the author actually did address in the rest of the paper?
If not, what is the main point of the paper? Is there a main point?
4. Introduction & Conclusion.
Think about the relationship between the introduction and conclusion. Does the conclusion logically connect to the introduction and thesis statement? How?
Is it a successful conclusion in that it offers closure to the paper while emphasizing the main thesis strongly one last time?
5. Strategies of Development.
Is the paper logically organized into separate sections with headings that represent the major and minor points of the argument?
Are the sections of the paper organized into a logical sequence which supports the thesis statement?
What strategies of development do you see the author using on the paragraph level or in the paper as a whole? Which are the most successful?
6. Development of Ideas.
Are the main points of the paper sufficiently developed?
Does the paper bring up any interesting points that you would like to see developed further?
Do you find any spots where the paper goes off on a tangent or addresses peripheral/irrelevant material?
Are there any places where the author relies too heavily on generalization?
7. Organization of the Argument.
Is the argument organized effectively?
Do the ideas follow each other in a logical, understandable way?
Are there any places that are confusing?
Is the argument based upon valid evidence such as peer-reviewed journal articles or opinion?
What strategies of development do you see the author using on the paragraph level? Which are the most successful?
8. Definitions.
Are all the terms well defined based upon an appropriate number of valid sources?
Terms that have generally accepted meanings in everyday language need to have precise definitions when used in scholarly writing. Identify the terms used in the paper that are well defined, and those that need better definitions.
9. Transitions.
How are the transitions between sections and paragraphs? Copy and paste below one transition that worked very well and state why you thought it was successful. Copy and paste below one transition that is less polished and state why it doesn't work as well.
Good Transition:
Bad Transition:
10. Paragraphing.
Think about the paragraphs themselves for a moment. Does the author use topic sentences?

Are the paragraphs more or less cohesive -- i.e. do they focus on/develop one idea?
Are any paragraphs too long or too short to address the writer’s main idea?
11. Style I.
Is the point of view consistent throughout the paper?
Does the author use precise, formal language?
Does the writer use unnecessary repetition?
Conversely, does the author use repetition deliberately for rhetorical effect? Is that successful? Give examples as applicable.
12. Style II.
Does s/he vary the sentence structure?
Are there too many short, choppy sentences, or ones that are overly complex and need to be broken up?
How do the sentences flow into one another?
Do you find any places where it seems that author deliberately has manipulated the organization of his/her sentences to enhance this sense of flow?
Copy and paste one sentence that you liked and explain why you liked it.
Copy and paste one sentence that you thought could have been improved and why.
13. Grammar & Punctuation.
Are there any grammatical/mechanical errors (including problems with punctuation)?
Are there any consistent problems with diction, usage, or words misused that you can point out to the author?
16. Integrating paraphrases and quotations.
Does the author integrate paraphrases and quotations well?
Does s/he vary the mode of integration?
Are all the paraphrases and quotations used relevant to the argument?
Does the author paraphrase where appropriate?
Is the citation form correct for the type of reference (APA format)?
17. Sources.
Does the author use source material effectively to support his/her points?
Are there enough sources used?
Are the sources paraphrased and synthesized effectively?
18. Further research.
Are there any points that seem to need further research to make them convincing?

Other (Not Listed) Sample Content Preview:

Peer Review Form
[First Name, Last Name]
[Institutional Affiliation]
[Date]
Peer Review Form
Name of Peer Reviewer: [First Name, Last Name]Name of the Author: Porsche JohnsonPaper Title: Literature Review on Job Promotion
1 Thesis
Job promotion is associated with a few challenges, especially when the organizational leaders fail to embrace perfect ways of total quality leadership and fairness. The following is a critical approach to the job promotion issue with a review of existing literature on the various aspects of job promotion and the factors which either promote its effectiveness or lack of seriousness.
The brevity and conciseness of the thesis aid the readers to grasp what the study is about quickly and identify the need for research. However, the thesis only offers a general idea of what the essay will address. The author broadly mentions “a few challenges” but does not specify these challenges to focus the thesis further. Although the author identifies these challenges in the literature review section, detailing them within your thesis ensures that it is specific. Thus, to improve the thesis statement in terms of stating the author’s position, the author must use specific words and make an arguable claim about promotion.
2 Introduction
The author does well to tie the topic of the paper (job promotion) to some important concepts (such as leadership, fairness, and total quality), which are significant to the study. Although the introduction section provides background information about the topic, it does not clearly state the cause of the job promotion issue, or describe the scope of its exploration. The author further does indicate the extent to which previous studies have explored this topic and whether the research was successful. Introducing the paper by defining job promotion is one way to make the article interesting to the reader though there is room for improvement. For example, Porsche can introduce the study by providing a relevant statistic about promotion or gender and leadership positions in the workplace. The introduction also includes the thesis statement, which helps the reader identify the purpose of the study and the issue the author plans to address.
3 Introduction- Follow Through
There is a natural progression of ideas from the paper’s introduction to the literature review, which comprises the body of the article. Although the concepts in this section are broad, the author does an excellent job of further breaking them down in the rest of the paper. The reader can also identify some of the keywords and variables (such as job promotion, effectiveness) repeatedly appearing across the literature review under different contexts (inequality, race, gender, among others).
4 Introduction & Conclusion
Although the author makes an effort to connect the paper’s conclusion to the thesis statement and the introduction, the reader still finds it challenging to identify what the author concludes from reviewing literature. The conclusion does offer closure because it leaves the reader with a few questions. For example, if one has not read the literature review section, they cannot tell which specific challenges impact job promotion and their specif...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Other (Not Listed) Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!
Order Now