Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
6 pages/≈1650 words
Sources:
6 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Health, Medicine, Nursing
Type:
Other (Not Listed)
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 25.92
Topic:

Barriers to Preventing Perinatal and Postnatal Depression

Other (Not Listed) Instructions:

Assessment Description
Prepare this assignment as a 1,500-1,750 word paper using the instructor feedback from the previous course assignments and the guidelines below.
PICOT Question
Revise the PICOT question you wrote in the Topic 1 assignment using the feedback you received from your instructor.
The final PICOT question will provide a framework for your capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study).
Research Critiques
In the Topic 2 and Topic 3 assignments, you completed a qualitative and quantitative research critique on two articles for each type of study (4 articles total). Use the feedback you received from your instructor on these assignments to finalize the critical analysis of each study by making appropriate revisions.
The completed analysis should connect to your identified practice problem of interest that is the basis for your PICOT question.
Refer to "Research Critiques and PICOT Guidelines - Final Draft." Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative in the structure of a formal paper.
Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change
Discuss the link between the PICOT question, the research articles, and the nursing practice problem you identified. Include relevant details and supporting explanation and use that information to propose evidence-based practice changes.
General Requirements
You are required to cite a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
Please use guideline one and two to complete this final draft.

GUIDELINE ONE
Research Critiques and PICOT Question Guidelines –
Final Draft
Use this document to organize the content from your four studies into your final draft.
Quantitative and Quantitative Studies
Nursing Practice Problem and PICOT Question
1.What is your identified nursing practice problem?
2.List your PICOT question, following one of the templated formats reviewed in the course.
Background
1.Summary of studies. Include problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research
question.
How do these four articles support the nurse practice issue you chose?
1.Discuss how these articles will be used to answer your PICOT question.
2.Describe how the interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified
in your PICOT question.
Method of Study:
1.State the methods of the articles you are comparing and describe how they are different.
2.Consider the methods you identified in your chosen articles and state one benefit and one
limitation of each method.
Results of Study
1.Summarize the key findings of each of the studies into a comprehensive summary.
2.What are the implications of the four studies you chose in nursing practice?
Ethical Considerations
1.Discuss two ethical consideration in conducting research.
2.Describe how the researchers in the four articles you choose took these ethical considerations into account while performing their research.
Outcomes Comparison
1.What are the anticipated outcomes for your PICOT question?
2.How do the outcomes of the four articles you chose compare to your anticipated outcomes?
Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change
1.What is the link between the PICOT question, the research articles, and the nursing practice
problem you identified?
2.Based on this information, propose an evidence-based practice change for your identified setting.
GUIDELINE TWO
Research Critiques and PICOT Question Guidelines – Final DraftUse this document to organize the content from your four studies into your final draft.
Quantitative and Quantitative Studies
Background
1.Summary of studies. Include problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research
question.
How do these two articles support the nurse practice issue you chose?
1.Discuss how these articles will be used to answer your PICOT question.
2.Describe how the interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified
in your PICOT question.
Method of Study:
1.State the methods of the articles you are comparing and describe how they are different.
2.Consider the methods you identified in your chosen articles and state one benefit and one
limitation of each method.
Results of Study
1.Summarize the key findings of each of the studies into a comprehensive summary.
2.What are the implications of the four studies you chose in nursing practice?
Ethical Considerations
1.Discuss two ethical consideration in conducting research.
2.Describe how the researchers in the four articles you choose took these ethical considerations into account while performing their research.
Outcomes Comparison
1.What are the anticipated outcomes for your PICOT question?
2.How do the outcomes of the four articles you chose compare to your anticipated outcomes

Other (Not Listed) Sample Content Preview:

Barriers to Preventing Perinatal and Postnatal Depression
PICOT Question: Among expectant mothers (Population), how effective are non-pharmacological interventions (Intervention) compared to pharmacological interventions (Comparison) in managing depression (Outcome) during the perinatal period (Time)?
Qualitative Studies
Background of Study
Preventing and managing perinatal depression will improve health outcomes in pregnant mothers and infants social-emotional. Researchers have identified different interventions, including a cognitive-behavioral intervention for managing perinatal depression. Low-income women are disproportionately affected by postpartum depression, and interventions for addressing maternal depression are either individualized or group-based based on what is feasible. Both non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions prevent, treat and manage depression. Still, the lack of integrated interventions to manage maternal depression affects the ability to enhance long-term outcomes (Baggett et al., 2021).
Identifying barriers to preventing perinatal and postnatal depression and implementing the most effective preventive interventions help promote maternal health (Diebold et al., 2020). The research by Diebold et al. (2020) considers the mothers-babies programs in group intervention to manage perinatal depression and professionals actively involved in implementing the intervention. The research question is the appropriateness of the mothers-babies (MB) programs in managing perinatal depression showed it was a viable option that is also potentially acceptable by professionals.
Relationship with PICOT Question
 The research by Baggett et al. (2021) highlighted interventions in social-emotional-communication development reduce the risk of postpartum depression-related outcomes. The researchers opposed a non-pharmacological approach that mothers can use. Similarly, the article by Diebold et al. (2020) is related to the PICOT question and focuses on mothers-babies programs, a non-pharmacological intervention effective in perinatal depression. Both articles focus on prenatal depression and address the efficacy of a non-pharmacological intervention in maternal depression. 
 The articles address the PICOT question's main focus with non-pharmacological interventions studied to determine their effectiveness in prenatal and perinatal depression, which is the same as that of the PICOT question. Still, the comparison is pharmacological interventions, and there is more research on the effectiveness of different medications in maternal depression. The articles did not compare the main non-pharmacological intervention with non-pharmacological or pharmacological interventions. 
Method of Study
Baggett et al. (2021) used a two-arm randomized controlled intent-to-explore trial method with a randomized assignment. Such randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies the effect compared to control treatment, and participants were analyzed based on a specific category, irrespective of the treatment they received. The approach is an unbiased method to evaluate the intervention's effectiveness, making the method reliable and generalizable results. Still, the method is expensive and requires...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to depression essays:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!
Order Now