Freewill

“Free Will’ is the capability of rational agents to choose a course of action from various alternatives. Free will postulates that individuals are able to make choices out of their own free will. On the other hand, “Determinism” postulates that causal flaws govern everything in the universe. Many philosophers agree that an individual can only be responsible for the actions they perform freely. Nevertheless, the validity of this statement has been doubted by some. This paper provides an argument for this principle. The paper will also explain two objections to the argument and provide defenses against these objections.
Individuals may do as they wish without constraint or hindrance. This is the concept of free will. Therefore, it is possible for both necessity and freedom to coexist. In regards to this, the free will permits a belief both in the most complete causal explanations of human behavior and in the freedom of Individuals. As a matter of fact, when properly defined, the concept of free will may resolve plainly and agreeably the determinism-free will controversy for many individuals. Nevertheless, this might happen at the cost of ignoring the essence of the concept of free will because freedom is simply a measure a lack of opposition or constraint.
Justification of the freewill principle
The principle that individuals should be held responsible for actions they perform freely can be justified in line with Libertarians main arguments. In respect to Libertarians, every individual is free to make the choices they do or perform. Having the free will to perform an action means that an individual will only be responsible for the actions he performs out of his free will. Besides, moral responsibility entails that every human being has a choice to make, particularly between good and evil. Therefore, before making any choices, an individual must consider moral responsibility because it is a common notion that we have duties and th...