Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
3 pages/≈825 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
MLA
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 12.96
Topic:

Philosophy argumentative essay 2-Question III. Social Sciences Essay

Essay Instructions:

essay will be evaluated on the degree to which it demonstrates competence with the relevant texts and material covered in class, the quality of reasoning and writing, and on the degree to which it engages philosophically and creatively with the issues raised by the essay prompt. Review Argumentative Essay Levels of Mastery.pdf(NB: this document and writing advice can be found under Files-->Writing Advice and Tools) to get a sense of the varying degrees of mastery for each major aspect of an argumentative essay.
The essay requires you to write an argumentative essay on a new topic. Choose one of the following topics for your second essay:
I.) Reconstruct Jackson’s knowledge argument against physicalism. Explain one of Churchland’s objections (from the Jackson paper we read) and Jackson’s reply to that objection. Critically assess Jackson’s reply: Does Jackson successfully defend his position in his reply to Churchland’s objection? Support your answer with reasons.
II.) Reconstruct Turing’s argument for the claim that the Turing test is a plausible criterion for intelligence. Describe the Chinese Room and explain how it can be read as a challenge to the idea that the Turing test is a plausible criterion for intelligence. Critically assess the challenge: Does the Chinese Room challenge succeed? Support your answer with reasons. Briefly describe a possible objection to your position and defend your position against that possible objection. Be sure that your discussion addresses the following claim: A plausible criterion for attributing intelligence to humans is their verbal behavior.
III.) Is it better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied? What is Mill’s answer to this question? What argument or arguments does Mill provide in support of his answer? Critically assess Mill’s answer: Do you agree or disagree with Mill? Support your answer with reasons. Then explain a possible objection to your position. Finally, defend your position against that anticipated objection. Be sure that your discussion addresses the following claim, inspired by Paul’s account of transformative experience: Experience teaches one something one could not come to know without having that experience.
IV.) Describe the problem of other minds, as presented by Carruthers. Explain why Carruthers thinks we should take the problem of other minds seriously. Do youthink that the problem of other minds should be taken seriously? Support your answer with reasons. Then explain a possible objection to your position. Finally, defend your position against that anticipated objection.
V.) Explain how Barnes’ “difference maker” account of disability understands disability. Incorporate discussion of some comparison case to illustrate the view. Barnes relies on comparisons with “gayness” to make her case. It might be helpful to consider other kinds of minority difference and intersectionalities between race, class, gender, and so forth as you reflect on her proposal. Critically assess Barnes’ view: Do you think it works, or are there problems with it? Support your answer with reasons. Then explain a possible objection to your position. Finally, defend your position against that anticipated objection

Essay Sample Content Preview:
Student’s Name
Professor’s Name
Course
Date
Philosophy argumentative essay 2-Question III
John Stuart Mill suggests in his philosophical writing that it is better to be human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied and better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied. He compares ignorance symbolically to a pig and a fool and wisdom to humans and Socrates. The author highlights the value of knowledge to self-realization, explains how predominantly it reflects in personality, and suggests that one should experience both lives. He suggests that the fool and the pig are satisfied because they know not much to worry about life, but he only focuses on the differences in the value of satisfaction. The perception of comfort, pleasure, or happiness is different depending on the level of awareness. Therefore, it is better to be a pig satisfied than human dissatisfied.
Mill’s answer to the question, “Is it better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied?” is straight forward. He argues that if one wants to achieve satisfaction, then they need to obtain information regardless of their mental state (Mill 19). Being able to distinguish between both lower form and higher form puts humans in a better position to understand the pros and cons, thereby being satisfied with their situation. The author brings up the idea of choices, how they influence a person’s capacity to make decisions. The more options one has, the better their chances to get satisfied with their situation. One might think that they are better off living a lower form because they do not have an idea of what it feels to live a different life. The author disputes the thought of being contented with the little that one has and describes it as being ignorant. Considering no human being would want to be an animal and no intelligent person would wish to be a fool, among other examples that illustrate the value of awareness, the author believes that those of a higher form is happier than of the lower.
I tend to disagree with the author since he builds an idea based on his opinion, but realistically it is subjective. Whether his argument considers the quality of the happiness between the lower form and higher form is unknown. He supposes that pleasures...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to scientific essays:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!