Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
6 pages/≈1650 words
Sources:
2 Sources
Style:
MLA
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 25.92
Topic:

International Political Science

Essay Instructions:

To get full credit on the essay, you must do all of the following:
5%: An introductory sentence
20%: Using your own words, identify and describe your answer to the question.
20%: Discuss several examples (at least 2) from the reading or lecture that supports your answer, and use those
examples to further illustrate your argument.
5%: A thesis statement: Summarize your main idea.
1. Compare and contrast structure vs agency, and material vs ideological interests. How do these concepts describe human knowledge? Discuss two theories, and explain their relationship between structure, agency, material interests, and ideological interests.
2. Discuss the difference between absolute vs relative gains and high vs low politics. How does this help distinguish between realism and liberalism?
3. Describe the divide between problem solving theories and critical theories. What does this divide tell us about our ability to understand international politics?
4. Compare and contrast how liberalism and constructivism discuss norms and values. How do these different focuses provide useful lenses for learning about international politics?
5. Discuss the differences between modernist constructivists, critical constructivists, modernist linguistic constructivists, and radical constructivists. How does constructivism provide an understanding of the significance of cognition and language in the formation of norms and values?
6. What elements of Marxist theory are evident in other theories of international relations? What does it mean to “historicize everything,” and how does that help explain and understand international politics

Essay Sample Content Preview:
Name:
Tutor:
Course:
Date:
International Political Science
The distinctions between structure and agency as well as between material and ideological interest form the major divides in international relations theory. Structure refers to the recurrent organized measures that impact or impede the opportunities available for individuals to act freely. On the hand, agency refers to the ability of individuals to be free and determine their own actions. Conversely material interests refer to material forces that explain behavior geared towards acquisition of material terms like money, wealth, and power whereas ideological interests refer to those actions motivated by altruism and tend to go against the individual’s material interests. These concepts describe human knowledge in the sense that what we know could be the result of continuous influence by the environment we are in or are our culture and societies. At the same time, what an individual knows could be the product of his own adoptions and personal agency. Conversely, human knowledge could be directed towards material desired such as wealth, prestige, or power. At the same time, human knowledge could be driven by altruistic forces. Neoliberalism is a theory that stresses the importance of market competition and advocates for minimal government interference in social and economic affairs. This theory relates to the ideas of agency and idealism interests since it holds that free markets are the most-efficient way of distributing resources and that markets can govern themselves without state interference. On the other neorealism is a theory that stresses the importance of power politics in global relations and views war as an imminent possibility. The theory relates to structure and materialism because it views the international system as socially constructed and focuses on power and interest.
The difference between absolute and relative gains as well as that between high and low politics are critical to distinguishing between realism and liberalism. High politics refers to politics that addresses the most pertinent issues critical to the survival of the state while low politics denotes politics that revolves around issues that are not crucial to the survival of the state. High politics deals with such matters as national security, military strength, and diplomacy whereas low politics covers such domestic issues as economic and social concerns. On the other hand, absolute gains refer to all state cooperating together in order to profit without giving importance to how much one state gains over others as long as all states gain whereas relative gains gives less importance to cooperation between states and focuses on the relative gains between states. These two differences help differentiate between realism and liberalism because they speak to the central ideas of each. For instance, realism is more concerned with high politics and argues that high politics tends to dominate interstate relations, resulting in states concentrating on security as well as the inevitable security dilemma. On the other hand, liberalism focuses less on power struggles between states and more on economic interdependence and financial interest by promoting cooperative interactions between states....
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to scientific essays:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!