Philosophical Tradition: Understanding of Kant's Arguments

Name
Course
Instructor
Date
Question 2. Carefully read Kant’s Third Antinomy (A444/B472-A451/B479). Reconstruct the argument for the “Thesis.” Reconstruct the argument for the “Antithesis.” How does Kant resolve the antinomy? In your view, how successful/plausible/convincing is this resolution?
Text Analysis 2 (Philosophical Tradition)
Kant’s Third Antinomy focuses on the possibility of causality where there is free will and determinism of natural causes. There are causal conditions of the world where the philosopher explains spontaneity and causal determinism. To explain his thoughts, Kant uses personal freedom as the starting point to evaluate the cause of causal change. The thesis is that in the world, causality according to the laws of nature is not the only and to explain this, there is a need for causality of freedom. The antithesis is that there is no freedom in the world and everything happens based on the laws of nature. There is an incompatibility between freedom which is the thesis, and determinism, which is the antithesis.
Kant presents the arguments of the antinomies by identifying the thesis and antithesis positions and assessing a solution to the contradictions arising from the antinomy. The main idea is to provide proof of the strongest arguments. To Kant, each of the positions demonstrates that, regardless of how strong they are, the reasoning of both positions, each one will prove to the other that their conclusions are erroneous. There is a conflict of the pure reason each party would support their positions and discredit the other where the contrary arguments are accepted.
The argument to justify the thesis is based on the idea that in the causal explanation, every causal series concludes after a finite series of causes. The first assumption is that there is only causality that is based on determinism, where nothing happens without the law of nature. However, then there is no first or completion of the series of conditions, and this contradicts the initial assumption of that everything happens according to the laws of nature (A446/ B 474). When the series of appearances cannot remain incomplete, there is an assumption that the causality that is not determine to previous causes. The explanation for causality that capable of initiating a series of phenomena is free causality
The antithesis is based on the idea that there is no freedom in the world and things are determined by the laws of nature. To Kant understanding antithesis requires assuming there is a transcendental freedom, which can initiate a state and consequently and then there are a series of consequences arising from this (A447/ N 475). The first proof is that if there were freedom, then the free cause would have no causal antecedent. Then when a cause lacks a causal antecedent, there is not sufficient cause. Then everything happens when there is a sufficient cause and vice versa. Thus, there is no freedom in the world.
There is action and determining the possibility or impossibility ...