Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
3 pages/≈825 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
Chicago
Subject:
History
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 10.8
Topic:

Written Analysis : Article Review History Essay Paper

Essay Instructions:

Please use Turabian style for the essay.

 

Learning Outcomes

After completing this exercise, students will be able to:

  • identify the thesis of a written work
  • distinguish the author’s purpose for writing an article
  • express any biases in the author’s presentation of written material.

Overview

The purpose of the article review essay is to critically analyze an article written on a topic represented in the course.

Download Articles

  • Articles (ZIP, 18 MB)

Procedure

Download and choose an article from the ZIP folder. Read the article with care, and ensure that your essay addresses the following information:

  • Your name and the date
  • Author(s)
  • Bibliographic info (title, source, date, page numbers)
  • Subject of article (brief synopsis)
  • Thesis of article (focus or controlling idea)

Your essay must also address the following questions:

  • How does the author support the thesis (examples, description, opinion, anecdotes, or other means), and how do these examples, etc. specifically support the thesis? Give some examples.
  • What is the purpose of the article (to persuade, argue, describe, explain, entertain)?
  • Are the issues raised in the reading addressed adequately, passed over, or even ignored?
  • Can you detect any biases in the author’s presentation of the material in the article? These could be lurking under the surface, unconscious to the writer, and stem from the author’s background, including education, social class, etc.—all of which might contribute to how the material in the article has been framed or presented.
  • What are your biases or preconceptions about the subject of this reading? Do these in any way modify how you respond to the article?

Submission and Due Date

  1. Save a draft of your file in DOCX format, named as follows:
  • lastnamefirstinitial_writtenanalysis2draft.docx
  • for example, John Doe would name the file “doej_writtenanalysis2draft.docx”.
  1. Post a draft of your work for peer review to the appropriate Unit 8 discussion forum by 11:59 p.m. U.S. EST/EDT on Day 1 of Unit 8.
  2. Review your peers' work and provide constructive feedback by 11:59 p.m. U.S. EST/EDT on Due Day 7 Unit 8.
  3. Make necessary changes based on the feedback you received from your peers and instructor.
  4. Save a final version of your file in DOCX format, named as follows:
  • lastnamefirstinitial_writtenanalysis2final.docx
  • for example, John Doe would name the file “doej_writtenanalysis2final.docx”.
  1. Submit your final file via the Submissions link in the course menu by 11:59 p.m. U.S. EST/EDT on Day 7 of Unit 9.

Grading

Written Analysis 2 will be graded according to the criteria specified in the Written Analysis 2 grading rubric, which can be found in Grades on the Course Menu. For details on grading, refer to the Syllabus.

Essay Sample Content Preview:

WRITTEN ANALYSIS
Name
Class
Date
1.Author
The author of the article is Robin Osborne.
2. Bibliographic information
The title of the article is The Viewing and Obscuring of the Parthenon Frieze. It is sourced from The Journal of Hellenic Studies, Vol. 107. The journal was published by The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies in 1987. The script reads from pages 98-105 of the journal.
3. Subject of the article
The script suggests that archaeologists encounter significant challenges in coming to terms with the existence of the Parthenon Frieze. Although they have tried to understand the building and style of the object, they have not been able to capture the exact terms relating to these aspects of the Parthenon Frieze. Thus, they end up viewing the position of the building as perverse, it’s subject matter impenetrable and the style anomalous. The description of the aspects reveals the significant difficulty in viewing and obscuring the object, meaning that archaeologists may not have the capability to understand and yield any distinct explanation on the Parthenon Frieze.[ Robin Osborne, "The viewing and obscuring of the Parthenon frieze," The Journal of Hellenic Studies 107 (1987), (98)]
4. Thesis of the article
This article reveals the difficulties in the viewing and obscuring of the Parthenon Frieze. Although various groups of individuals may have tried to understand the issue, they cannot comprehend the mystery behind the existence and position of the object, in relation to its visibility.[Osborne, (102)]
5. Support of the thesis
The position of the Parthenon Frieze is incomprehensible. According to the explanations given by Lawrence and Ashmole, the designing of the object could be invisible such that it cannot impact men at all. However, the views from different people reveal that the visibility of the Parthenon Frieze could be determined by the aim of different group of individuals. For example, Athenians were showing off to their fellow Greeks. The group used conspicuous display in the existence of the object as the basis of their pride towards Greeks. The Athenians make the display to their gods. This could portray a show of the power they bestow upon the gods. However, i...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to art essays:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!
Order Now