Enhanced Synthesis Paper Literature & Language Essay

Enhanced Synthesis Paper
Name
Institution
Enhanced Synthesis Paper
Reflection
The reflection provides an outline of the revision process and the incorporation of feedback from the instructor. The process of revision comprised of re-reading the original paper on synthesis, and identification of main ideas discussed in the article. The synthesis paper focused on the discussion of three ideas, which formed the contextual basis of the paper. Further analysis into the nature of the three ideas resulted in uncovering arguments, which provided a basis for the narrative of the propositions. Part of the analysis leads to the identification of gaps for further improvement and understanding of the information explained. The outcome of the endeavor was the identification of suitable articles, which focused on arguments that were similar to and complemented the main ideas the article focused on. Also, the new material uncovered catered for the recommendations the instructor provided. The discussion in the paper focuses on each theme identified in the synthesis paper and illustrates the relationship that exists between the latter information, and the complementary information. The paper also provides insight into the utility of additional information about the thesis of the enhanced paper on the synthesis. Part of the information includes justification of previously identified factors, or aspects of the factors, which contribute to understanding the dynamics involved in the process of synthesis. The final endeavor of the paper is to address the gaps identified in the paper on the synthesis. The additional resources incorporated into the paper seek to provide answers to the questions existing gaps arose. The steps undertaken cater for the provisions the instructor proposed. All the information covered in the enhanced paper on synthesis provides justification of the main idea the paper proposes.
Introduction
The segment focuses on a reflection of the review of articles, which contribute to understanding the ideas discussed in the paper. The first article is ‘Knowing, Doing, and Becoming: Professional Identity Construction Among Public Affairs Doctoral Students by Smith and Hatmaker, 2014’. The paper provides a report on the examination of the process involved in training doctoral students, who deal with public affairs, on how to become researchers. Part of the information focuses on a multi-level model of tactics applicable in individual, relational, and organizational levels. The tactics are what create the capacity to become a researcher. The article provides the first theme of the individual effort of a scholar, which elaborates on the use of the proposed model for the accomplishment of the goal to become a researcher. The second paper of interest is ‘Conceptualizing Success in Doctoral Education: Perspectives of Faculty in Seven Disciplines by Gardner, 2009’. Gardner focuses on the propositions on how to succeed. The subject matter includes the most suitable practices for success; the influence of particular variables exerts on success and the relationship between success and specific variables. The article provides the second theme of academic success. An article from the additional resources elaborates...