Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
1 page/≈275 words
Sources:
3 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Literature & Language
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 3.6
Topic:

Annotating Your Sources. Literature & Language Essay

Essay Instructions:

You'll create a bibliography entry by following the steps below and answering the questions as thoroughly as possible. The questions will prompt you to engage in a conversation with your sources. You will need to complete this activity three times (for your three different sources).


A few reminders:
You may find one source on the Internet, but the remainder of your sources must come from a Shapiro Library database. You may wish to consider either the Opposing Viewpoints database or the Academic Search Complete database.
When identifying your sources, make sure to include the title, author(s), and the name of the database or website.
At least one of your three sources should present a counterargument*, a position an opponent of your argument might make.
Be sure to test all of your sources using the C.R.A.A.P. method.
This assignment requires three sources. Please note that your essay will require at least four sources.
Constructing Your Annotations
As you work on your annotations, remember to refer to the assignment guidelines and rubric (click here) to make sure you're fulfilling each aspect of the assignment. You can also download/print the rubric.
Your responses will be saved to the Notebook, which can be found under the "Course Tools" menu. You can also download all of your responses to a single Word document by following the directions at the bottom of this page.
Click on each of the following tabs to begin building your annotations for your three sources.
Source #1
Source #2
Step 1: Select a source from either the Opposing Viewpoints database or the Academic Search Complete database.
Step 2: Apply the C.R.A.A.P test to the source to determine if it is credible and reliable. Click here to download a copy of The C.R.A.A.P. Test Worksheet. Remember, credible sources should score 35 points or more on the test.
Step 3: Identify your source in the box below.
The next activity uses a rich text area. You can tab to the editor body. Press ALT-F10 to get to the toolbar. Press ESC to return to the editor body. A save button is available in the top toolbar all the way to the right and will become visible when it receives focus.
Saved
Submit
Step 4: Fill in the blanks below to generate the summary portion of your bibliography entry. Type the completed sentences into the textboxes.
It seems this source is arguing ____________________.
This source is using this evidence to support that argument: ____________________.
The next activity uses a rich text area. You can tab to the editor body. Press ALT-F10 to get to the toolbar. Press ESC to return to the editor body. A save button is available in the top toolbar all the way to the right and will become visible when it receives focus.
Saved
Submit
Step 5: Fill in the blank below to generate the credibility portion of your bibliography entry. Type the completed sentence into the textbox.
Personally, I believe (the source is doing a good job/bad job of supporting its arguments and why) ____________________.
The next activity uses a rich text area. You can tab to the editor body. Press ALT-F10 to get to the toolbar. Press ESC to return to the editor body. A save button is available in the top toolbar all the way to the right and will become visible when it receives focus.
Saved
Submit
Step 6: Fill in the blanks below to generate the relevance portion of your bibliography entry. Type the completed sentences into the textboxes.
My problem is ________________________.
This is my intended argument: ________________________.
I think this source will be very helpful in supporting my argument because ________________________.
I think this source will support my other sources because ________________________.
The next activity uses a rich text area. You can tab to the editor body. Press ALT-F10 to get to the toolbar. Press ESC to return to the editor body. A save button is available in the top toolbar all the way to the right and will become visible when it receives focus.
Saved
Submit
Source #3
***I have attached the last two paper's that you have written for me.

Essay Sample Content Preview:

Annotating Sources
Student's Name
Institutional Affiliation
Halberstam, M. (2013). Hacking Back: Reevaluating the Legality of Retaliatory Cyberattacks. Geo. Wash. Int'l L. Rev., 46, 199. ( Academic search complete database)
It seems that this source is arguing for on the fact that hacking back is not a solution to eradicating cyber-attack. However, it exposes the company to other attacks hence creating an endless battle.
The source uses the case study of the Stuxnet cyber-attack that led to the destruction of Iran's nuclear centrifuges.
I think that this source has done a good job of supporting my argument because whenever a company retaliates during a cyber-attack, it triggers more attacks because the hacker may not be willing to accept defeat.
My problem is the issue of hacking back.
My argument is intended to show that hacking back is not a solution to cyber-attacks.
This source will support my argument because it argues against hacking back.
I think this source will support my other sources because they are based on hacking back regarding cyber-attacks.
Iasiello, E. (2014). Hacking back: Not the right solution. Parame...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to language essays:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!