Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
2 pages/≈550 words
Sources:
2 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Law
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 8.64
Topic:

Pros and Cons of Lifetime Appointment for Supreme Court

Essay Instructions:

Article III of the U.S. Constitution states “The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behavior, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office.” This article means that all federal judges including Supreme Court justices have life tenure. This means they will be appointed for life and only lose their job when then choose to resign, retire, or if they are
Discuss the pros of lifetime appointment for Supreme Court
Discuss the cons of lifetime appointment for Supreme Court
Do you think Supreme Court judges should be appointed for life or should they have term limits, like officials in Congress and the President? Explain your
Your paper must be at least 500
Please double space your paper and use standard 12 point
Make sure to proofread your paper before
Please follow APA format when referencing information from outside sources.

Essay Sample Content Preview:

Article III of the U.S. Constitution Essay
Student’s Name
College/University
Course
Professor’s Name
Due Date
Article III of the U.S. Constitution indicates that the country’s judicial power is anchored on a single supreme court and other lower-level courts as may be established by the Congress. The supreme and lower-level judges are expected to demonstrate good behavior and receive adequate compensation during their tenure. In this vein, federal judges hold office for life. This paper delineates the pros and cons of lifetime Supreme Court appointments and the rationales for why judges should have term limits.
Pros of Lifetime Appointment for Supreme Court
Lifetime appointments for Supreme Court judges ensure judicial independence preservation. This independence is one of the significant advantages since it insulates justices from the requirement to seek reappointment and political pressure. This insulation harbors them from making partial and non-principled decisions due to fear of public opinion and reprisal. Consequently, it ensures that the judiciary maintains its integrity as a coequal and distinct arm of government. Expertise and experience accumulation of justice over time is another advantage of a lifetime appointment. Such appointments enable supreme court judges to develop a comprehensive understanding of the Constitution, law, and legal complexities. Also, it ensures partisanship where the courts remain insulated and entirely immune (Doerfler & Moyn, 2021). Therefore, the experience provides nuanced and informed decision-making, fostering stability and consistency in interpreting and applying the law.
Cons of Lifetime Appointment for Supreme Court
Lifetime appointments for supreme court judges have a vital drawback in that judges are allowed to work in court long after a decrease in their abilities. As the justices age, they may find it challenging to stay updated with technological and societal advancements. Therefore, their decisions may not address emerging issues and reflect contemporary societal values. Moreover, lifetime ap...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!