Analysis of Trump’s Policy of Shutting down Mosques. Law Essay

Analysis of Trump’s Policy of Shutting down Mosques
Student’s Name
Institution
Date
Analysis of Trump’s Policy of Shutting down Mosques
Introduction
Comprehension of the religious beliefs of other people is an essential component of tolerance since their faith traditions typically define a critical part of their identity. In the United States, the spectrum of religious diversity is a crucial aspect of our culture as a whole. Religion can sometimes be a cornerstone of political debate. The First Amendment highlights that the U.S Congress shall make no law that neither disrespect the establishment of a religion nor prevents individuals from exercising this religion freely (De Andréa, 2016).
Additionally, it indicates that no laws shall abridge the freedom of speech or of the press or the right of the people to assemble peacefully. Finally, it highlights that citizens can petition the government or redress of grievances. This paper will assess the rationale behind President Trump’s statement which proposed the consideration of shutting down mosques in the United States. It will also defend the government’s position and make arguments that support the president’s decision of closing down mosques in the United States.
Analysis
Why Trump’s policy does not violate the First Amendment.
In the analysis of the First Amendment, the first provision prevents Congress from developing a law that establishes a religion or prevents the liberty of exercising a specific region by the citizens. This restriction is upon the government and not on the people. The next provision that prohibits the government from abridging the freedom of speech means that the government cannot prevent citizens from speaking their mind (Parker, & Vronsky, 2016).
The government cannot control, fund or shut down the press from printing the truth. Additionally, the government cannot prohibit people from assembling peacefully and also, cannot prevent anyone from gathering for religious or any other reason as long as the assemblies are peaceful. There also can be no policy that prohibits people from petitioning the government for redressing their grievances (Awan, & Blakemore, 2016). This means that if a particular person has a problem with the government, they have the right to petition to remedy or redress the situation.
Based on president Trumps policy, it is clear that religious liberty as guaranteed by the Constitution was not created to be concluded that members of any particular religion are exempted from the governing laws of the nation. As for Muslims, their faith does not grant them the constitutional right to beat their wife, abuse their children or stone heretics (De Andréa, 2016). It also does not give them the legal right to force other adults to belong to Islam against their will. Therefore, there are constitutionally valid laws that prevent or restrict Muslims, who are adherents of Sharia law from imposing its systems unwillingly on others.
Mosques are Sharia-compliant facilities, and therefore without adequately highlighting that they are a religious organization, they should be closed down (Parker, & Vronsky, 2016). These are political institutions with Sharia...