Article Review History Essay Research Paper Coursework

Article Review
Name
Institution
Course
Date
ARTICLE REVIEW
“Violent Russia, Deadly Marxism: Russia in the Epoch of Violence, 1905-21” by Peter Holquist, examines why the Russian Revolution is an important topic when it comes to modern political violence. The author also seeks to provide a diverse geographic and chronological framework for the violence of the Russian Revolution. In the article, theories unfold to scrutinize all angles the war seemed to have been triggered. An example of a theory that has been used is the theory of circumstances. The author asserts that this theory presents the Russian Revolution as a specific feature of Russia. Violence was a crucial aspect of the Russian Revolution. Both circumstantial and ideological have been discussed by the author. According to Holquist (2003), structures of the regimes differed and so did the notions in the European traditions and cultures held dearly by inhabitants. Further, controversies on whether these norms would lead to war are explored in this paper.
According to Holquist (2003), Buldakov's utterances in "The Red Times of Troubles" reveal a patriarchal structure of the era in Russia one characterized by peasant ideas. Circumstantial waves imbued with psycho-social aspects of the rustic mindset brought tidal instances of violence and terror. Additionally, Orlando Figes' analysis reflects what we would call falling victim to own bad ideologies. Here, Orlando points out that Russian calamity was imminent due to its citizens' cultural backwardness which became their trap thus disputing invasion by evil neighbors. The view of Arno Mayer is focused on the geo-political perspective that rocked both French and Russian regimes. In his account, his attempt to relate the common factor between the two uncovers certain insight; Russian's case distinguishes itself from historic influences of the time which most likely affected the French regime.
According to Holquist (2003), Prominent Russia's administrative use of force marks its dynasty which was similar to Ottoman's and Austro-Hungarian reigns. The author points to trends used in quest of conquering and subjugation as malign and oppressive with no resemblance at all with the European powers or the empirical methods they believed to have allied to. Its inception in the nineteenth century (the 1890s) aimed to subdue the immerging internal resistance, the then opposition represented by parties intending to imitate foreign systems. This oppre...