Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
5 pages/β‰ˆ1375 words
Sources:
6 Sources
Style:
Other
Subject:
Law
Type:
Coursework
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 29.16
Topic:

Medical Products Liability: Litigation Claims Against Pradaxa

Coursework Instructions:

Medical Products Liability

Adopt a Drug or Medical Product/Device

For this assignment you will need to find a drug or medical product/device that is FDA approved (or was FDA approved at some point in time) and has been subjected to litigation claims that the drug or medical product/device caused harm to patients that used the product or device.

The goal of the assignment is to have you work your way through the FDA approval and post-approval processes, and then see how the processes and the information from the processes is incorporated (or not) into litigation.

To complete this paper, you will need to do outside research to find a drug or medical product/device that was approved by the FDA and that was subsequently subjected to litigation. There are a number of resources that you can use to find a drug or medical product/device. One resource is Westlaw to search for cases involving drugs or medical products/devices. There are a variety of databases that will provide information about cases involving drugs or medical products/devices.

There are also some internet websites that may have helpful information including:

You are also free to use other websites you may find in your research. These websites can provide you with names of drugs and products that have been subjected to FDA administrative actions or litigation. You can then take the drug or product/devices and search Westlaw to see if any of them were subjected to court cases that you can use for this paper.

After you find your drug or medical product/device, you need to perform the following tasks and answer the following questions:

NOTE TO STUDENTS: you need to select a drug or medical product/device from your research above that will allow you to answer these questions, so it is a good idea to skim through the questions before you start your research and then when you find a drug or product/device you can begin going through the questions to see if you can find enough information about the drug or product/device to answer the questions.

Question #1

Go to the FDA website for Drug or Product/Device approvals. Review the approval documents and labeling for the drug or product/device and answer these questions:

1. What side effects, adverse reactions, or possible risks or dangers associated with the use of the drug or product/device were noted in the approval or in the labeling of the drug or product/device?

2. What did the FDA require the manufacturer to do about them (i.e. conduct post-approval studies, provide warnings, etc.)?

3. Do you think the FDA's approval requirements (the studies, warnings, etc.) seemed to address the possible side effects, adverse reactions, or possible risks or dangers that the FDA was aware of at the time it approved the drug?

Question #2

Search the internet (including the FDA's website) and other sources (like news articles, etc.) and gather information about the problems that started to develop with the use of the drug or product/device after FDA approval. Answer these questions:

1. What problems started to develop with the use of the drug or medical product/device?

2. What harm or injuries were the problems causing patients?

3. Were the problems the same or similar to the side effects, adverse reactions, or possible risks or dangers associated with the use of the drug or product/device that the FDA was aware of when it approved the drug?

Question #3

Search the FDA's website and you may want to search other sites as well and answer these questions:

1. Did the FDA issue any recalls, warning letters, safety alerts, Dear Doctor letters, labeling changes, or take any form of post-approval action regarding the problems noted in question 2?

2. If so, explain what the FDA did and whether you think the action(s) was sufficient to address the problems that the FDA was aware of at the time. Are there any additional actions you think the FDA should have taken?

3. If the FDA did not take any action, explain what you think the FDA should have done given its authority in this area.

Question #4

Find a court case regarding the drug or medical product/device and answer these questions:

NOTE TO STUDENTS: one case may have a number of reported decisions and sometimes the reported decisions on Westlaw or a court database will involve preliminary or collateral issues like jurisdiction, standing, intervention, experts, class action status, etc. You can use these decisions as long as you are able to answer the questions. You may need to find a decision that deals with a substantive issue regarding the plaintiff's liability claims in order to answer the questions. Westlaw now often has the parties' pleadings from the case online and you may need to review those documents to answer some of the questions if the information is not in the decision.

1. What is the decision(s) about? In other words, what issue or issues does the decision discuss and resolve and what is the court's reasoning in resolving the issue(s).

Provide a citation for the decision(s) and be sure to address the following:

A. What were the plaintiff's claims in the lawsuit (failure to warn, design defect, manufacturer defect)?

B. What were the defendant's defenses to the claims?

2. What role if any did the FDA's actions play in the litigation? For this question, be sure to address the following:

A. What arguments, if any, the plaintiff and defendant made regarding the FDA's actions. For example, did the plaintiff assert that the FDA's post-approval administrative actions demonstrate that the product was defective, or did the defendant assert that FDA approval shows that the product is not defective, etc.?

B. Describe how the court addressed and resolved the arguments regarding the FDA's actions. If the court did not address and resolve the arguments, describe how you think the court should have resolved them based on the arguments that were made and what you have learned about these topics in class.

C. What do you think about the parties' arguments and the court's resolution of the arguments? Were they consistent with what you learned in class regarding regulatory standards and products liability and related topics like preemption?

3. If the FDA's actions were not mentioned in the decisions or the parties pleadings, then discuss what arguments could be made given the facts of the case and how the court should have resolved them based on the arguments that were made and what you have learned about these topics in class.

Question # 5

Review the information you have put together to answer the prior questions and answer these questions:

1. If you were to think about all of the information you gathered in the prior questions and throughout this course as describing a process that begins with FDA approval and ends with litigation, how well do you think the current process works to prevent harm to consumers and to provide redress to those who are harmed?

2. What changes do you think could improve the process?

3. What do you think about the role that litigation plays in the process of ensuring the safety of drugs or medical products/devices? In answering this questions consider:

A. Whether litigation and the potential remedies from litigation such as monetary damages or punitive damages provide any incentive for drug and medical product/device manufacturers to make safe drugs and products/devices.

B. Whether litigation provides a sufficient or satisfactory remedy to those that are injured by drugs.

C. Are there other options are there besides litigation that might work better?

Coursework Sample Content Preview:
SPL
Student's Name
Institutional Affiliation
SPL
Pradaxa is a blood thinner (prevents platelets in the blood from sticking or clotting) that was approved in 2010 by FDA. It is used to prevent the systemic embolism and stroke in patients who suffer non-vascular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). It is also used to treat any blood clots in the lungs or legs and reduces them from occurring again.
QUESTION 1
1 During the approval process of the drug by FDA the following side effects were documented:
* Bloody stools.
* Diarrhea.
* Nausea.
* Indigestion.
* Vomiting.
Additionally, the following adverse reactions are described elsewhere in the labelling:
* Increased Risk of Thrombotic Events after Premature Discontinuation.
* Spinal Anesthesia.
* Bleeding.
* Thromboembolic and bleeding events in patients with prosthetic heart valves (Drug.com, n.d).
2 The above side effects and adverse reactions of Pradaxa to its consumers prompted FDA to ask the manufacturer to carry out various clinical experience trials or trials on patients. This was aimed at identifying any other effects that were not yet known. Another objective of this directive towards the manufacturer was to find out any remedies or ways of mitigating adverse reactions. Another directive was to place warnings on the labels to warn the public of any adverse reactions (Drug.com, n.d).
3 Yes. FDA’s approval requirements for the drug addressed the possible side and adverse effects of the drug. The clinical study was to establish whether the drug causes the stated effects and find out any other effects that were not yet known. The warnings were to warn the consumers before they consume the drug. It also served as a warning to those consumers who are allergic to the ingredients to avoid any further complications.
QUESTION 2
1 During the clinical trials and study periods, Pradaxa was proved to be safer in patients. However, it is not the case since its approval. The clinical trials’ results differ from the real world experience with the drug (Lipworth & Kerridge, 2014). Since its approval by FDA as a safe drug the following adverse reactions and problems started to develop excessive bleeding such as hemorrhagic strokes, and kidney diseases.
2 It is evident that the bleeding side effects of the drug immediately surrounded and caused a serious concern about it shortly after it entered the market. This internal problem is causing serious problems to the patients. This problems include; coughing blood, dizziness and severe headaches, and weakness and swelling of the feet, arms, ankles or hands (Drugwatch.com, n.d). The excessive internal bleeding has caused hundreds of deaths of patients. The drug has proved to be effective at preventing natural blood clots from forming in the body but it disables the ability of the body from stopping bleeding after injuries (Saiontz and Kirk, n.d). This leads to excessive bleeding which is the cause of the reported deaths and body weaknesses.
3 Bleeding as a side effect of Pradaxa is well described in the labelling of the drug but it does not inform the patients what effects the bleeding will cause to them. However, the loss of life is an adverse effec...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These Other Coursework Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!