Differences Between Interview and Interrogation

Interview Vs. Interrogation
Name
Course
Date
Question 1
There are three parts to an interview. The first one is welcoming the respondent into the interview, setting the stage, and presenting the interview's goals and format. The second section of the interview consists of the body of the interview. In this part, you gather information by questioning the respondent and hearing their responses. The last part is ending the conversation or interview. Thank the respondent for their time, remind them when they may expect to hear back, and have them verify the information they have already given.
Question 2
Interviews and interrogations are the backbones of many investigative actions undertaken by law enforcement, and the information obtained from them is typically admissible as key evidence in court (Buckwalter, 2013). Although there are some similarities between the two, the fact is that there are also crucial distinctions that have far-reaching ramifications for the legality of certain approaches used by investigators. An investigator must know the distinctions between interviews and interrogations and the limits of their authority throughout an investigation. Despite their shared characteristics, interviews and interrogations are conducted quite differently.
To obtain information, one may have an interview with one or more people. The tone of an interview is usually friendly and accusation-free. Also, the individual being questioned could not be a suspect but a witness, bystander, subject matter expert, or someone else with knowledge that might be useful to the investigation (Buckwalter, 2013). An interrogation is a formal procedure in which an interrogator asks a suspect a series of questions to get a confession or admission of guilt of the suspect's own will. The individual being questioned is either the suspect or someone else suspected of being involved in the crime. Questioning is more accusatory and direct than an interview. While both interviews and interrogations seek answers to questions, the former is conducted informally, while the latter is reserved for officially interrogating witnesses or suspects in a criminal investigation. Victims and witnesses are usually interviewed. Suspects are subjected to interrogations. The purpose of an interrogation is to gather evidence of the suspect's guilt that may be presented in court. The purpose of an interview is to gather information from someone who may have witnessed a crime or otherwise gained knowledge about the crime under investigation. The purpose of an interrogation is to determine whether or not the person suspected of the crime is guilty through specialized information-gathering techniques and technology.
To prepare for interviews, detectives must first identify witnesses at the crime scene using the information supplied by dispatch, other police, or the people who voluntarily offered themselves as witnesses. After this, the witnesses must be isolated and told they must not talk to anyone else about the incident. It is important to keep witnesses away from the public and the press. Next, the investigators need to obtain background information on the crime that was committed; this is the information about the individuals involved, events, and circumsta...