Apple-Samsung Negotiations: Theories and Conflict Resolution

******
The final task for this order:
please revise based on the attached document. I made some edits. thanks
ORSC_2123_Final_Paper.docx
The writer don’t need to rewrite the whole thing. Just edit based on the attached document. Thanks!
*****
Original instructions:
Paper of Real-Life Conflict/Negotiation/Mediation (40 percent of grade): Research and analyze an actual negotiation – e.g., from your personal experience, research, interviews, or as reported in the media. For example, you might identify a labor-management dispute, merger or acquisition talks, international trade or nuclear disarmament negotiations, political disputes, major business deals, etc. The negotiation does not have to be current, it can be taken from history. This is your opportunity to apply the principles from our readings and learnings from class discussions and exercises to a real-life situation. After identifying and researching your topic, you will prepare and present your findings in class and lead a brief discussion of the issues surrounding the negotiation or conflict you have identified. You may research and present the topic individually or as a pair of two students. However, your paper submission and all writings must be your own. At the end of the term, you will submit a paper that incorporates your findings and analysis and any additional information developed during your class presentation/discussion. The paper and presentation will demonstrate your comprehension of specific approaches to conflict and negotiation or mediation. The paper (which you will write individually) should include: 1) a brief summary of the context and parties directly and indirectly involved; 2) a description of the CLASS THEORIES applicable to the conflict; 3) obstacles to conflict resolution; and 4) any specific strategies used (or that could/should have been used) to resolve the conflict. The paper should be 6-8 pages in length, double spaced, and include appropriate citations for sources.
Additional comments from messages:
what is the BATNA and ZOPA for both companies? identify that
you are talking about the lawsuit not the negotiation. who participated in this negotiation? CEO of the two companies or what? if emotion are not involved in the case, why do you even mention it? they ended up sue each other, and do you consider this as maintaining relationship? you don't need to use all the concepts that I mentioned, those are just my examples. this is due in 15 hours. I really need this asap
Additional comments from the C:
please Use information, theories, approaches, and structures from classroom discussions and the readings (citing or referring where possible), analyze this negotiation. Please describe the positions, interests, bottom lines, and BATNAs of both the parties. Identify Supporters, Disrupters, Ratifiers, Closers, and Quasi-Mediators. Is there a ZOPA? What is the ZOPA? Does/would either side deceive or mislead? Should they? What are possible outcomes and in your judgment the most likely outcomes. Why? What are likely emotions during the negotiation and how will they affect the proceedings? What might be the emotional effects? You may not address all these questions in your answer and you are free to add other relevant aspects not specifically covered in the question; the most comprehesive and thorough answers will receive the most points.