Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
3 pages/≈825 words
Sources:
No Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Management
Type:
Case Study
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 12.96
Topic:

Corporate Governance Factors for Negotiating a Joint Venture

Case Study Instructions:

There are THREE sections of this exam. Be sure to complete all three sections: section A, section B and section C. Please upload your work on eClass under relevant link.

Section A: Short essay Question (maximum 3 pages) Total: 30 marks Answer the below questions. Your answer will be graded out of 30 marks. You must write in standard essay format (thesis statement, intro, body, conclusion). Please cite properly (preferably APA style). Maximum 3 pages, double space, Times New Roman, size 12. "Over the last century, management has been involved in bringing better benefits to workers globally”. Do you agree with this statement? Why and why not? Draw on lectures AND course materials (from Trickker’s chapters, Braveman’s paper, additional readings, documentaries, and debate) in your responses. Additional references from outside class are welcome.

Section B: Maximum 3 pages Total: 30 marks Analyze and discuss the attached podcast The role of ESG and purpose by Sean Brown and Robin Nuttall (McKinsey &Company), using at least two of the theses explained in class (for example, shareholder model, stakeholder model, firm regulation, director primacy model, the governance partnership, etc.). Be sure to explain the thesis, justify why you chose the thesis you did; explain how it relates to the podcast. You are encouraged to reference similar/different readings we have read and reference certain theories that might inform your approach to analyzing the podcast. A PDF version of the podcast transcription is posted on the lecture eClass under December right below the exam questions. You must write in standard essay format (thesis statement, intro, body, conclusion) and draw on lectures and course materials in your response. Maximum 3 pages, double space, Times New Roman, size 12. Please cite all sources properly. Additional references from outside class are welcome.

Section C: Case study Total: 40 marks Case study: Joyful International Holdings Ltd

Questions: Mr Alan Lau Man Seung, managing director and chairman of the JIH Group of companies, knows that you have recently been studying corporate governance, and has sought your advice as a consultant. He has no experience of joint ventures with overseas companies and is concerned about the way the proposed joint venture board might work in practice. Write a report for Mr Lau explaining the corporate governance matters that you feel he should consider in negotiating the joint venture with Nortel. In your report to Mr Lau describe any other governance issues in the JIH Group that you feel he should consider and explain what might be done about them. Total marks from Section A, Section B and Section C = 100 marks

Case Study Sample Content Preview:

"Corporate Governance Factors for Negotiating a Joint Venture with Nortel"
Student name
Institution name
Couse
Instructor’s name
Date
Report to Mr. Lau Man Seung
This report is intended to summarize the corporate governance factors to be considered when negotiating a joint venture with Nortel. This report will also offer information on current corporate governance problems within the JIH Group and suggestions for solutions (Koedijk et al., 2019).
1. Corporate Governance Considerations for the Joint Venture
Mr. Lau needs to consider the following corporate governance considerations when negotiating a joint venture with Nortel:
Board Structure: The proposed joint venture between Nortel and JEL is to be incorporated in Hong Kong and should have equal equity capital provided by each party. The board of directors should have three members from each company, including the CEO. The board should have a clear mandate and responsibility to oversee the joint venture, including formulating strategies and policies and reviewing performance (Koedijk et al., 2019).
Conflicts of Interest: Potential conflicts of interest must be identified and managed to ensure the joint venture operates in the best interests of both parties. It is essential to consider the potential for conflicts of interest in areas such as the allocation of resources, decision-making, and the distribution of profits (Ansoff et al., 2018).
Transparency: Transparency is essential for the success of any joint venture. It is vital that both parties are open and honest with each other and that there is a clear understanding of each other’s expectations. The board should ensure sufficient access to information to effectively manage the joint venture (Koedijk et al., 2019).
Risk Management: Risk management is a critical element of any corporate venture. It is crucial to consider the joint venture’s potential risks and have a clear strategy for managing them (Ansoff et al., 2018). The evaluation should include a comprehensive risk management system with clear policies and procedures to identify and address potential risks.
2. Corporate Governance Issues in the JIH Group
The JIH Group also faces a range of corporate governance issues which should be addressed. These include:
Shareholder Rights: The Group is owned by a family and related parties, who own 68% of the voting stock (IMCA, 2015). The board should consider ways to ensure that minority shareholders’ interests are protected and that they have adequate representation on the board. This will make them feel that they have a voice in the greater decision making of the business too.
Audit Committee: The Group has an audit committee, which should be reviewed to ensure that it is properly constituted and has sufficient authority and resources to carry out its responsibilities.
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Case Study Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!