Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
2 pages/β‰ˆ550 words
Sources:
5 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Communications & Media
Type:
Case Study
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 8.91
Topic:

Technology as Filters for Non-Credible Sources

Case Study Instructions:

Create a post and answer the questions below.
According to the Pew Research Center (2017), some experts state that the information environment will improve partly because “technology will help label, filter or ban misinformation” (p. 6). Facebook is developing technology to weed out non-credible sources.
1. How much of the job of filtering out non-credible sources can technology do right now? For what reasons?
2. If technology can’t do the entire job, who else is responsible for filtering out non-credible sources, and what do they need to do?
On February 14, 2018, students at Marie Stoneman Douglass High School in Parkland, FL, experienced a mass shooting. Soon afterward, news about Scot Peterson’s role as a security guard broke.
3. Different people have their own opinions about whether Scot Peterson fulfilled his professional duty during the shooting. Recall what your opinion might have been before the start of this week. How, if at all, has your opinion changed? Justify your answer with at least 2 facts, citing your sources. Exclude speculation.
4. A lot of media coverage has focused on Scot Peterson. Of all of it, what percentage do you guesstimate provides facts?
5. How certain are you of your conclusion about Scot Peterson? If you have any uncertainty, what would you need to see or hear to be able to draw a definite conclusion?
Readings and videos :
Pew Research Center. (2017). The future of truth and misinformation online. Retrieved from http://assets(dot)pewresearch(dot)org/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2017/10/19095643/PI_2017.10.19_Future-of-Truth-and-Misinformation_FINAL.pdf (focus on pp. 2-6)
Even when you identify credible information sources, such as journal and newspaper articles, you must recognize that even they are fallible and thus be able to distinguish between what is fact and what is not fact. The following video and readings present a case study of public scrutiny of Scot Peterson’s role as a security guard during the mass shooting at Marie Stoneman Douglass High School in Parkland, FL, on February 14, 2018. Part of your discussion will draw from these readings and videos, so I recommend that you review the discussion questions before reviewing the materials.
*CBS Miami. (2018, February 22). Broward sheriff Scott Israel provides additional details about response to Parkland school shooting [Online video]. Retrieved from https://www(dot)youtube(dot)com/watch?v=BXpKuq15njo (watch all 11:53)
*DiRuzzo, J. A. (2018, February 26). [Memo to the South Florida Community and the American Public]. Retrieved from https://wsvn(dot)com/news/local/scot-petersons-full-statement-on-marjory-stoneman-douglas-school-shooting/ (read all 2 pages)
*Flores, R. (2018, April 20). Broward county sheriff Scott Israel to face no-confidence vote from his own deputies. CNN. Retrieved from https://www(dot)cnn(dot)com/2018/04/20/us/broward-sheriff-scott-israel-no-confidence-vote/index.html (read all 3 pages)
*Saslow, E. (2018, June 4)."It was my job, and I didn’t find him": Stoneman Douglas resource officer remains haunted by massacre. Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www(dot)washingtonpost(dot)com/national/it-was-my-job-and-i-didnt-find-him-stoneman-douglas-resource-officer-remains-haunted-by-massacre/2018/06/04/796f1c16-679d-11e8-9e38-24e693b38637_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.42977c9a4a23 (read all 8 pages)

Case Study Sample Content Preview:

Discussion
Student's Name
Institution
Course Name and Number
Professor's Name
Date
Discussion
Question 1
Right now, technology can only do so little to filter out non-credible sources. There are no technological applications developed to filter out non-credible sources, although Facebook is working on a technology to ensure credible information sources. As one researcher revealed, news aggregators such as Facebook will become better at eliminating misinformation, but still, there will be an increase in misinformation in the future (Anderson & Rainie, 2017). There is room for technology to improve the credibility of information sources. For instance, algorithmic filters, apps, and truth ratings can be used to weed out non-credible sources (Anderson & Rainie, 2017). However, at the moment, there is little that technology is doing to help enhance information credibility.
Question 2
Consumers of information are also responsible for filtering out non-credible sources. Anyone who consumes information has a responsibility to evaluate the credibility of the information to ensure they are only consuming accurate information that has no tainted agenda. As Anderson and Rainie (2017) reveal, to ensure that people can evaluate the credibility of information, they need information literacy. Information literacy allows people to discover information and analyze the information for reliability before they can apply it in their small and big decisions. To gain information literacy, people will need to sharpen their critical thinking and research skills.
Question 3
Before the start of this week, I thought Scot Peterson was a coward who failed to fulfill his professional duty during the shooting. I judged him based on the Sherriff's information, revealing that Scot Peterson never went inside despite there being an active shooter (CBS Miami, 2018). However, now I believe he has fulfilled his professional duty. One, Scot Peterson followed protocol; he went to investigate the reported possible firecrackers, locked down the school when he realized shots were being fired, and called in his police radio for back-up (Saslow, 2018). Two, Scot Peter...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Case Study Samples: