Crisis Communication: Crisis at Boeing

Crisis Communication: Boeing Case Study
Student Name
University
Course
Instructor Name
Due Date

Crisis Communication: Boeing Case Study

Crisis communication is a specialty in public relations designed to protect and defend an individual or organization facing a public challenge to its reputation. The four main dimensions of crisis response include readiness, response, reassurance, and recovery. Business leaders who keep in touch with these phases are better positioned to deal with a threat to an organization's reputation. According to Puil (2019), leaders must take full ownership to defend an organization's reputation. Based on these ideas of crisis communication, the current paper is a case study of the recent crisis at Boeing following the crashes of the 737 MAX.

Case Outline

            According to Plowman (Plowman, 2005), strategic management starts with identifying an issue that might affect an organization's reputation. Managing such issues minimizes the impact the company faces in times of crisis. Therefore, this process consists of four stages; issue identification, problem identification, position, and interests (Plowman et al., 1995 and (Werder, Wrigley, Junee, & Lewis, 2022). Thus, going by Lowman's framework, the issue at Boeing is about the recent successive crashes of two of its 737 max. Following the Ethiopian and Indonesian crashes that claimed over 300 lives, there has been public concern about Boeing as investigative reports indicate the aviation manufacturer is at fault for not revealing information about the MCAS system (Newburger & Josephs, 2019). As a result, Boeing faces a myriad of lawsuits, investigations by government agencies, and waning public trusts. Furthermore, the company sales were in turmoil after the global grounding of the 737 MAX. In the first year after grounding, sales fell by 21% from the previous (Gelles, 2019). These issues have plummeted the organization into a public relations problem.

The problem is that the organizations’ initial leadership did not show concern or empathy for the victims. According to Puil (2019) failed to take hold of the problem, take extreme ownership and revisit its mission. Boeing’s vision is To Connect, Protect, Explore, and Inspire the World though Aerospace Innovation. Goldstein (2019). After the Indonesian crash, instead of the leadership showing concern for the victims and the stricken public, they lobbied President Trump not to ground the 737 MAX. As argued by Baker (Baker, 2019), Boeing’s response to the two fatal crashes was marked by confusing messaging and delayed apologies. Thus, the organizations are currently fighting to defend their reputation against lawsuits, investigations, pressure from investors, and relevant government agencies.

            The first key stakeholder is the public. It assumes that 737 MAX should be grounded until they are declared safe by regulatory agencies....