Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
7 pages/β‰ˆ1925 words
Sources:
4 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Health, Medicine, Nursing
Type:
Article Critique
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 30.24
Topic:

Quantitative Critique:Chemotherapy Effects in Women with Breast Cancer

Article Critique Instructions:

Your assignment is to critique a research article. In general, you will answer the questions:

Is the research article well written, containing all of the required components?

Does the author(s) support the hypotheses using appropriate research techniques?  

Does the research contribute to nursing knowledge?

The rubric of how your grade on this paper is calculated will be uploaded as a separate document. However,

this will give you a few guidelines as you go and get started.

 

First of all, the title of your critique should include some basic information:

1.  Name(s) of the author(s)

2.  Title of article

3.  Title of journal, volume number, date, month and page numbers, doi number

 

The bulk of your critique should consist of your qualified opinion of the article.

Read the article you are to critique once to get an overview. Then read it again, critically. At this point you may want to make some notes to yourself.  You should likely print your article. 

 

Your paper should be 5 – 7 pages.  It is written in a scholarly format.  Do not use the word “I” or say “I think.”  Your paper will read like a research article. The paper must follow the guidelines of the American Psychological Association Manual, 6th or 7th edition.   Your presentation must be well reasoned and objective. Your paper must clearly articulate whether or not you agree or disagree with the author and the findings. 

 

The following are some questions you may want to address in your critique no matter what type of article you are critiquing. (Use your discretion. These points don’t have to be discussed in this order, and some may not be pertinent to your particular article.)

1.  Is the title of the article appropriate and clear?

2.  Is the abstract specific, representative of the article, and in the correct form?

3.  Is the purpose of the article made clear in the introduction?

4.  Do you find errors of fact and interpretation?

5.  Is all of the discussion relevant?

6.  Has the author cited the pertinent, and only the pertinent, literature? If the author has included inconsequential references, or references that are not pertinent, suggest deleting them.

7.  Have any ideas been overemphasized or underemphasized? Suggest specific revisions.

8.  Should some sections of the manuscript be expanded, condensed or omitted?

9.  Are the author’s statements clear? Challenge ambiguous statements. Suggest by examples how clarity can be achieved, but do not merely substitute your style for the author’s.

10.  What underlying assumptions does the author have?

11.  Has the author been objective in his or her discussion of the topic?

 

Also:

1.  Is the objective of the experiment or of the observations important for the field?

2.  Are the experimental methods described adequately?

3.  Are the study design and methods appropriate for the purposes of the study?

4.  Have the procedures been presented in enough detail to enable a reader to duplicate them?

Article Critique Sample Content Preview:

Article Critique
Your Name
Subject and Section
Professor’s Name
Date
Introduction
Article critique is essential in validating the research results. This process requires a holistic and detailed analysis of the research, from the objectives to the conclusion. This paper aims to critique an article concerning a prospective study on the life changes of individuals with breast cancer. Specifically, the paper shall examine in detail the introduction, review of literature, theoretical framework used, methodology, results and discussion, abstract, implications in the practice of nursing, and future research implications of Oh & Cho’s (2020) research paper entitled “Changes in Fatigue, Psychological Distress, and Quality of Life After Chemotherapy in Women with Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study.”
Review of Introduction
Problem Statement
The introduction of the research paper is brief, and most of the information was about the problem statement. The researchers discussed the implications of chemotherapy in the life of women with breast cancer, stating that it results in significant mortality and critically affects the lives of the patients while fighting against the disease. Specifically, it most commonly results in anxiety, depression, and fatigue, leading to a 42.5% to 57% prevalence of the latter two in patients with breast cancer. The researchers also discussed the mechanism behind the fatigue and the pathophysiology behind the clustering of symptoms related to chemotherapy (Oh & Cho, 2020).
Purpose
The objectives of the study are as follows: 1) To recognize the modifications and its interconnections with the anxiety-depression-fatigue symptom cluster during the course of the cancer treatment, beginning from the initial treatment and through the follow-up; 2) To recognize the impact on the patient’s quality of life of psychological distress and fatigue (Oh & Cho, 2020).
Research Questions
The researchers ask, what is the impact of chemotherapy in breast cancer patients’ life compared from the initial assessment, one to three days before the start of the study, and after six months of follow-up?
Hypotheses / Null hypotheses
The primary hypothesis is that there is a significant adverse change in the quality of life of breast cancer patients when the initial assessment and the 6-month follow-up results are compared. Conversely, the null hypothesis states that there are no significant changes in the quality of life of breast patients from the initial assessment compared to the 6-month follow-up results (Oh & Cho, 2020).
Review of Literature
The review of the literature was not included in the research paper. Therefore, the analysis of this area is based on the summary of the review of the literature found in the introduction. The researchers were able to explain the primary factors that impact the quality of life of breast cancer patients. Based on this, the researchers utilized primary sources, all of which are scholarly articles. Moreover, the researchers stated statistics related to the study.
However, the articles used are outdated, which dates from 2005 to 2012. Ideally, the literature review should contain information within the five-...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Article Critique Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!