Evidence-Based Teaching Strategies for Practicum Setting

Requires Lopeswrite
Assessment Description
An effective nurse educator has current, researched knowledge of teaching strategies to use in the educational setting. Effective evidence-based teaching strategies allow learners to collaborate with peers and participate in higher order thinking.
The purpose of this assignment is to compile an annotated bibliography of evidence-based teaching strategies for your practicum setting.
Provide a six-entry annotated bibliography of peer-reviewed/scholarly literature related to your chosen practicum topic and appropriate teaching strategies. Include a 150-word summary for each resource that includes the following:
Description of the evidence-based teaching strategy and its application to your practicum topic.
Description of the relevancy and accuracy of the source.
Description of the quality of the source.
Utilize "Preparing Annotated Bibliographies," located in the Student Success Center, to review general guidelines and specific examples for creating an annotated bibliography.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
RUBRIC
Rubric Criteria
Six Bibliographic Entries
13 points
Criteria Description
Six entries are included in an annotated bibliography.
5. Target
13 points
The submitted assignment includes six entries in an annotated bibliography.
4. Acceptable
11.96 points
N/A
3. Approaching
11.44 points
N/A
2. Insufficient
10.4 points
N/A
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The submitted assignment does not include six entries in an annotated bibliography.
Evidence-Based Teaching Strategy and Application to Practicum Topic
14.3 points
Criteria Description
Evidence-based teaching strategy and application to practicum topic are described for each source.
5. Target
14.3 points
A description of the evidence-based teaching strategy and its application to the practicum topic for each source selected is thorough.
4. Acceptable
13.16 points
A description of the evidence-based teaching strategy and its application to the practicum topic for each source selected is detailed.
3. Approaching
12.58 points
A description of the evidence-based teaching strategy and its application to the practicum topic for each source selected is present.
2. Insufficient
11.44 points
A description of the evidence-based teaching strategy and its application to the practicum topic for each source selected lacks detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description of the evidence-based teaching strategy and its application to the practicum topic for each source selected is not present.
Relevancy and Accuracy
14.3 points
Criteria Description
Relevancy of each source is described.
5. Target
14.3 points
A description of the relevancy and accuracy of each source is thorough.
4. Acceptable
13.16 points
A description of the relevancy and accuracy of the source is detailed.
3. Approaching
12.58 points
A description of the relevancy and accuracy of each source is present.
2. Insufficient
11.44 points
A description of the relevancy and accuracy of each source is incomplete or incorrect.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description of the relevancy and accuracy of each source is not present.
Quality
13.65 points
Criteria Description
Quality of each source is described.
5. Target
13.65 points
A description of the quality of each source is thorough.
4. Acceptable
12.56 points
A description of the quality of each source is detailed.
3. Approaching
12.01 points
A description of the quality of each source is present.
2. Insufficient
10.92 points
A description of the quality of each source is incomplete or incorrect.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description of the quality of each source is not present.
Research
3.25 points
Criteria Description
Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are timely, relevant, and address assignment criteria.
5. Target
3.25 points
Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Research addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
4. Acceptable
2.99 points
Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
3. Approaching
2.86 points
Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, and timeliness.
2. Insufficient
2.6 points
Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
No outside sources were used to support the assignment.
Mechanics of Writing
3.25 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
5. Target
3.25 points
No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
4. Acceptable
2.99 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
3. Approaching
2.86 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Insufficient
2.6 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
Format/Documentation
3.25 points
Criteria Description
Format/Documentation Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,
5. Target
3.25 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.
4. Acceptable
2.99 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
3. Approaching
2.86 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
2. Insufficient
2.6 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.