Why do women decide to have abortions? How could its illegalization in some states and countries negatively impact a woman?

Your Name
Subject and Section
Professor’s Name
March 22, 2021
Research Proposal – Abortion and its Effects
Abortion is conceivably one of the most extensively debated and controversial subjects in nearly every nation. Generally, this debate hinges upon protecting and preserving the mother's equity to live (or seldom to conserve her character) and the unborn child's right to life. Nevertheless, each side of the dissension values presumes why numerous countries possess varying regulations concerning abortion. It is inherent to elucidate the tenable, judicious vindications that women have if deciding to have an abortion and the pernicious consequences of illegalizing the before-mentioned practice in numerous states and countries worldwide—furthermore, acknowledging the analysis of studies and their results thus exhibiting how decreeing abortion illegal unpropitiously impacts the mother's life. It is not unprecedented for people to disregard reverberations resulting from governments withholding a women's constitutional right to their body.
Consequently, the heedlessness of disquieting women worldwide, barricading their welfare, impels unfortunate ramifications that prevail to be unspoken about, further propagating necessary queries. Every woman's voice deserves to be heard, valued, and respected regardless of her circumstances. What are the significant effects of restricting safe abortions from women? Furthermore, what determinants might contribute to the negative or positive consequences exceeding one another?
Abortion in Various Circumstances
One of the main reasons why the illegalization of abortion is detrimental for women is the "conflicting ideologies" on what is generally "derailed discussions" about the subject matter. According to recently compiled global data, one-quarter of pregnancies result in abortion (Allotey-Reidpath et al., 2021). Abortions, however, remain illegal in many nations, resulting in either risk activities or adverse health consequences in both the mother and the fetus. However, different conceptions of what can be called "pro-life" and "pro-choice" varies depending on the situation. For example, in one article published by Asch (2021) in the American Journal of Public Health, about the effects of unreflective utilization of pre-natal testing suggests that both the terms ‘pro-life’ and ‘pro-choice’ may vary depending on each circumstance, such as defining what is considered as "pro-life" in situations when abortion would help save a mother's life in danger. However, the same concepts get more contradictory and debatable when circumstances merely causes indirect effects on the mother’s health or in the child’s future (i.e., financial incapacity of mother). In line with this, one of the instances that I believe this can be illustrated is in cases when a the pregnancy results from a crime (i.e., rape). Even though ‘pro-life choices’ would recommend that the mother should continue bearing the child, it is clear that in the long run, the same choice would be detrimental for her life, well-being, and even dignity, among others. However, Asch (2021) did not believe in absolute and unregulated abortion, rather she argued that certa...