Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
2 pages/≈550 words
Sources:
1 Source
Style:
MLA
Subject:
Literature & Language
Type:
Research Paper
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 8.64
Topic:

Consequential Ethical Theory - Act Utilitarianism

Research Paper Instructions:

This assignment builds upon the Module 4 Dropbox: Identification, Research, Analysis assignment you submitted previously. Be sure to review the feedback you received from that assignment, and make any necessary revisions BEFORE moving forward with this assignment.
Focusing on the same case as before, you will now complete the fourth step of the critical thinking process: 4) Application. You will apply a Consequential Ethical Theory - Act Utilitarianism - to resolve the main ethical/moral issue.
Again, review the Washington Post article, "The ethics of a second chance: Pig heart transplant recipient stabbed a man seven times years ago": https://www(dot)washingtonpost(dot)com/dc-md-va/2022/01/13/pig-heart-transplant-stabbing-david-bennett/
Follow the sample format, linked below.
Apply Act Utilitarianism, as follows:
Discussion (150 words minimum)
Paragraph - Summarize Act Utilitarianism. Include descriptions of the key terms/concepts: Utility, Net Utility, and Happiness. Use your own words. Do not use quotations. Paraphrase the information, and provide in-text citation(s) with the page number(s), where appropriate. In the Works Cited, be sure to cite your source(s).
Identification (one sentence in bold print)
Restate the main ethical/moral issue you previously identified in Module 4.
Analysis/Application - Act Utilitarianism (chart)
Use the same analysis chart you completed previously in Module 4 (following my feedback in Module 4 make necessary changes). Include four options, four stakeholders, and possible consequences.
In the chart, enter the happiness number for each consequence.
Provide the happiness scale you used.
Add a row to the bottom of the chart, and add up the numbers for each option to indicate the total Net Utility for each option. Remember, if a stakeholder is more than one person (e.g., group, team, family, citizens, business) estimate how many are in the group, and multiply the happiness number by the number of persons in the group. If a stakeholder is one person, multiplication is not needed.
Conclusion paragraph (150 words minimum)
State the "best" option, and explain how a true Act Utilitarian would come to this conclusion. Include the Net Utility number, and explain how you determined the number. Be impartial. Avoid any bias; do not express your own personal opinion; do not use the words, "I think" or "I feel." Finally, explain your thoughts on this ethical theory. Is this a good way to address this problem? Or any other problem? Why or why not?
Use the Dropbox Grading Criteria to help guide your completion of this assignment.
Dropbox Rules
Use MLA Formatting. Double-space the entire document. Adjust all font color/style/size to black Times New Roman 12 pt. Put the heading in the upper left corner of the first page; include your name, the professor's name, the course name, and the date. Use the document header to display your last name and page number in the upper right corner of each page. Put the "Works Cited" on the last page, and the total word count at the end of the document.
Attach your submission in the proper Microsoft Word format .doc or .docx or .rtf.
Review your TurnItIn Report. View the Reviewing a TurnItIn Report tutorial. Resubmit if necessary.

Research Paper Sample Content Preview:
Name:
Tutor:
Course:
Date:
Chapter 5: Consequential Ethical Theories
Introduction
Act utilitarianism is a form of utilitarian theory founded on the idea that one should choose that action that results in the best overall results or the most significant amount of good. Utility refers to happiness or well-being, whereas net utility denotes overall happiness or well-being. On the other hand, happiness means a complete and sufficient good (Vaughn, page 88). To determine whether an action results in the best consequences and was therefore ethical, it is essential to consider whether the act itself is good or bad, whether the recipient belongs to a group who’s good one should aim to maximize, and whether its actual consequences or foreseeable results should judge the morality of the action.
Identification and Moral Issue
Should criminals have an equal chance of receiving life-enhancing medical procedures? The moral issue in question is the fairness or unfairness of judging people based on their criminal history to determine whether or not they deserve healthcare services.
Analysis Chart
Stakeholders/Options

Disregard history and character of stakeholder

Consider the history and character of the stakeholder

Consider history alone

Consider character alone

Medical service provider on Patient based on medical practitioner’s perspective (Assuming three clinicians)

5 * 3 = 15

2 * 3 = 6

1 * 3 = 3

3 * 3 = 9

Medical service provider based on the Victim’s family’s perspective (Assuming a family of four members)

5 * 4 = 20

2 * 4 = 8

1 * 4 = 4

3 * 4 = 12

Medical service provider based on the society’s perspective (Assuming a population of one thousand people)

5 ...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These MLA Research Paper Samples: