Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
4 pages/≈1100 words
Sources:
6 Sources
Level:
MLA
Subject:
History
Type:
Research Paper
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 17.28
Topic:

U.S. Supreme Court Case Report - New York Times Vs. United States (Research Paper Sample)

Instructions:
This paper must include the following information from the U.S. Supreme Court Case: New York Times Vs. United States: The historical background surrounding the case. The circumstances of the case. The Constitutional question/issues of the case. The ruling of the Supreme Court and the rationale that was used. How the decision affects the United States today. Your agreement or disagreement with the decision (support your position with evidence). PAPER REQUIREMENTS: Each paper must contan a minimum of 1,000 words; be typed, double spaced, with 1" margins, type no larger than 12 point, and in font Times New Roman. Papers must include: Introductory paragraph. The body of the paper. conclusion. compelete scentences. college-level vocabulary and spelling. content. research. ANALYSIS. Sources and proper citation. actual word count. source..
Content:
Name: Instructor`s name: Course: Date: America Supreme Court Case Report Introduction It is important to understand that the confession rule is clearly stipulated by the court`s new constitution and should be followed to the letter. The main purpose of the law is to handle, address and question people in custody. The law gives arresting authority so that the suspects and the victims know the implications of their confession to their final judgment. This is done by letting them know they have the right to remain silence, that any issue he or she communicates may be used against him, has the right to obtain an attorney without charges and he also has the rights to present an attorney during the time of questioning. In order to achieve this rights some statement of rejections are usually needed, as well as, tricks. This paper will seek to analyze the U.S. Supreme Court Case Report, New York Times vs. United States. The Supreme Court and the U.S. constitution, clearly do not allow the prosecuting attorney or police officers as well as detectives, to question the defendant while in custody. Likewise the law does not allow any form of contact with the outside environment (Rosen, 2). Consequently, according to the law, none of the defendant is given effective and full warning of his rights during the interrogation process. As illustrated in both cases, the questioning involved oral admissions and signed agreements which were admitted in trials. It was also stated that the defendant were exceptionally convicted by the court law number 584 and were later affirmed in the court of appeal (Rosen, 4) According to the Supreme Court law of America, the prosecution could not use written or oral statement to decide on the victim`s case. The statements stemming from questioning of the victim by the law enforcement officers in custody, was illegal unless it followed the procedural safeguards effectives to secure the 5th Amendments privilege against self- incrimination. It continued to elaborate that the environment as well as the atmosphere of incommunicado interrogation should be improved. Depending on the way it exists nowadays, no one should be intimidated at work or undermine the privilege against self-incrimination. As elaborat...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to salem witch trials:

Need a Plagiarism Free Essay?
Submit your instructions!