Why Academics Stink at Writing by Steven Pinker (Reaction Paper Sample)
These papers will require approximately 2 paragraphs----one consisting of a summary of the reading for the day, and another giving your comment on the topic. At the end of each paper, you should also include a question that has come to you as a result of the reading.source..
Why Academics Stink at Writing by Steven Pinker
Academics mainly shared knowledge mostly with fellow scholars and in such case they at times fail to write clear focusing on abstractions and failing to communicate with a wider audience. Scholars in the west are taught to communicate in writing, but are not necessarily good at this at the same time, teaching writing to writers is also difficult since they tend to use prose that is obscure, clumsy and difficult to understand. Yet this contradicts the goal of spreading knowledge in scholarly work and even educators are stuck on traditional academic norms that even when ideas are expressed in non intelligible ways there is no concern that this is not easily understandable to many people. Pinker targets eminent scholars and highlights that there is professional narcissism that results in academic writing stinking. This assertion is based on his observation that writers have written without giving thought about the intended meaning, it is no surprise that scholars engage in what they consider intellectual discourse yet their writings are confusing and at times incoherent. Academic writing at the professional is expected to be comprehensible that even other scholars cannot understand and even other people can engage in academic discourse discussing ideas. Writing is complex and multidisciplinary, but academic writing should still be clear, but does not have to be bad. Academic writing is challenging that academic writers become boring without realizing that they fail to convey the intended mea...
- Reading Response: Richard Rodriguez's Scholarship BoyDescription: After reading Richard Rodriguez's Scholarship Boy, write a 2 page reflection of its summary, analysis, and reflection on the reading. Thanks in advance....2 pages/≈550 words | No Sources | MLA | Literature & Language | Reaction Paper |
- Wise man or a foolDescription: Wise man or a fool - Reaction Paper...1 page/≈275 words | 1 Source | MLA | Literature & Language | Reaction Paper |
- Braggioni: Character analysisDescription: Braggionis Character. Literature and Language Reaction Paper...1 page/≈275 words | 1 Source | MLA | Literature & Language | Reaction Paper |