Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
2 pages/β‰ˆ550 words
Sources:
2 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Life Sciences
Type:
Other (Not Listed)
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 7.92
Topic:

Cell Division and Aneuploidy

Other (Not Listed) Instructions:

SCI 200 Project Part Two: Speaking Notes Draft Guidelines and Rubric
Overview: An effective presentation includes a summary of the main points in the slides, but the presenter should add additional content in the speaker notes to help explain each point. Some presenters have the the ability to memorize the details through cues in the outline of the presentation, and some can even speak off the cuff. However, for this project, you will create speaker notes for the slides in your presentation, which is due in Module Eight. This will help you consider the outline of your presentation and the content you want to include on each slide.
Prompt: For this assignment, you will be drafting the speaker notes that will accompany your 5- to 7-slide presentation. The speaker notes can be bullet points related to each item on the slides, or more developed paragraphs that help you fill in the details you wouldn’t include on the slides. This choice is up to you, but either way, the speaker notes should contain substantial details that address each of the required parts of your presentation.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I. Provide a brief overview of the scientific background of your issue and question. How does the issue relate to the natural sciences?
II. Explain how the issue impacts the audience. In other words, how is the issue relevant to members of the audience? Why should the audience care about the response to your question or the outcome of your hypothesis? Support your response with specific examples from your research investigation.
III. Describe the empirical evidence you have to support your conclusions about the impact of the issue on you personally and on your audience. Support your response with specific examples from your research investigation.
IV. Explain why this issue is important to you personally. In other words, why did you select this issue to investigate?
V. Illustrate how your investigation of the issue impacted the way you thought about the issue. In other words, how did thinking like a scientist to research, develop a question, and formulate a hypothesis affect what you thought about the issue you selected? How did scientific thinking change the lens
through which you viewed the issue? Support your response with specific examples from your research investigation.
VI. Communicate your message in a way that is tailored to your specific audience. For instance, you could consider your vocabulary, your audience’s
potential knowledge of current natural science (or lack thereof), and what is specifically important to the audience. This element will not necessarily be a
separate slide or step in the process. In your notes that address the previous six prompts, note word choices or pieces that are specifically tailored for
your audience.
Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: The draft of your speaker notes can be bullet points or paragraphs related to each item on the slides. Submissions should be 2–4
pages, double spaced, with 12-point Times New Roman font and one-inch margins. You should use current APA guidelines (or another format approved by your
instructor) for any references. For your final project, please keep in mind that these speaker notes will accompany 5–7 slides

Other (Not Listed) Sample Content Preview:

SCI 200 Project Part Two: Speaking Notes
Student’s Name
Professor’s Name
Institutional Affiliations
Course Name and Number
Due Date
SCI 200 Project Part Two: Speaking Notes
Scientific Background of Issue and Question
Researchers consider cell division a critical natural science process because it explains diverse aspects of living things. In human beings, it elucidates tissue and organismal development (Ben-David and Amon, 2020). However, researchers agree that the process is not error-free, which raises concerns about adverse outcomes. For instance, Potapova and Gorbsky (2017) acknowledge the emergence of multiple complications in embryos when cell division mistakes occur, leading to spontaneous elimination. The author also indicates that this outcome triggers anomalies related to cancer disease. The awareness of these ramifications led to the question of whether aneuploidy is the cause of cancers and actions that scientists can take to prevent the errors. Since Ben-David and Amon (2020) define aneuploidy as the “numerical aberration of whole chromosomes,” investigating this issue in natural sciences is fundamental to finding appropriate solutions.
How the Issue Impacts the Audience
Biologists recognize that aneuploidy is a critical issue of concern in disease development. Investigating this problem is crucial for them because it allows them to isolate the root causes of diseases related to cell division. Potapova and Gorbsky (2017) indicate that chromosomal instability has always puzzled these professionals due to its dynamism and complications leading to aneuploidy. Unfortunately, research in this area remains challenging and laborious due to the technical difficulties of removing or introducing particular chromosomes in cells despite tools like Cre–Lox recombination (Ben-David and Amon, 2020). As a result, studies that advance information about aneuploidy are rare and vital. Moreover, understanding the connection between cancer and this anomaly would inform additional research that would contribute to groundbreaking developments in chromosomal analysis approaches.
Empirical Evidence Supporting the Impact of the Issue
Aneuploidy has a significant impact on all individuals. The unclear nature with which it occurs is an issue of concern ...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Other (Not Listed) Samples: