Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
5 pages/≈1375 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
MLA
Subject:
History
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 18
Topic:

Hatshepsut in a Devotional Attitude vs Marble Statue of a Kouros

Essay Instructions:

1.the formal analysis for two art pieces, please write as much detail as you can. 2. MUST write out the differences and similarities between these two art pieces, each point for one paragraph thanks! 3. MUST need some researches 4.MUST select the artwork from the list that is provided


 


METROPOLITAN MUSEUM PAPER ASSIGNMENT HAD 111-18 DR. SARAH S. WILKINS ASSIGNMENT INFORMATION: o This paper involves close looking, analyzing and comparing works you have seen first-hand. o It also requires some minimal research to support your analysis, and the documentation of this research through the use of citations (footnotes) and a bibliography. o You must write on one of the pairs of works listed at the end of this handout. o Read all instructions carefully and completely. DUE DATE: FRIDAY NOVEMBER 15 o Hard copies are required. o No extensions will be allowed unless there are extenuating circumstances discussed with me in advance. o If you are absent November 15, the paper is still due by the end of class. o You can email it to me to show it was finished on time o You must also submit a hard copy ASAP to the Art History Office (East Hall 205). o Late papers will be marked down 5 points each day they are late. o You must email me a copy and submit the hard copy to the Art History Office. o Papers submitted more than one week (7 days) late are not accepted. FORMATTING INFORMATION: (Follow directions carefully) Title Page: o You must have a title page which includes (at minimum) the following information: o Indicate which pair of works is your subject o Your name o HAD 111-18 Paper Length & Formatting: o A full 4-5 double-spaced pages of text o This page count does not include title page, any images, or bibliography o Times New Roman, 12-pt font o 1-inch margins o Indent the start of each paragraph o Do not put additional lines of space between paragraphs o Staple your paper Illustrations: o Images of the works are not required o If included, they should follow all text and bibliography, or be on your title page o Do not imbed them in your text to increase your page count o Remember that they do not count towards the page count 2 Citation & Sources: o There must be at least 5 citations in your paper, in the form of footnotes. o You must cite at least 2 scholarly/print sources in addition to any citations from the textbook or the Metropolitan Museum website. o **Do not use sources from the Web (with the exception of the Met website). o The 2 sources cannot include survey textbooks (such as Janson or Stokstad). o Formatting Citations: o Format citations as footnotes at the “foot” (bottom) of the page. o Do not use parenthetical in-text citations, for ex. (Author, page#). o **You must include the page number of the specific page being cited. o Bibliography: o You must include a bibliography page listing all the works cited in your notes. o This must be at least 2 books or scholarly articles, plus the textbook and Metropolitan Museum website and/or Metropolitan Museum wall text, if used. o See the “Information and Sources” section below and the Citation Handout for more information on using and formatting sources. GRADING: o The paper is worth 30% of your course grade. o You will be graded first and foremost on the quality of your thinking and analysis, but the quality of your writing is also crucial. o This is a formal paper, so use correct formatting, grammar, and spelling. PROOFREAD. GRADING CRITERIA (5 Categories): o PROJECT/THESIS: o You should express your own ideas about the assigned works (have a thesis/argument), and must use visual evidence, as well as information from your sources, to develop and support your claim. o **Define your project in a clear thesis statement in your introduction. o VISUAL ANALYSIS: o You should carefully visually analyze, and both compare and contrast the works. o Papers must put the works of art into a conversation with one another, and analyze them with regards to the thesis put forth in the introductory paragraph. o The paper should not be just visual analysis of two works, first one, then another. o Close and careful visual analysis must be used to support the author’s thesis. o WORKING WITH SOURCES: o Choose only relevant quotations and information from the textbook, museum label and at least 2 additional print sources. o Use direct quotations sparingly. o Do not drop in quotes without analyzing them or using them to argue your point. You must make the connections. ! Explain the connections between any direct quotations and your argument o You must cite your sources whenever you use them, even if you are paraphrasing (putting the information in your own words). If you do not, it is plagiarism. o See “Information and Sources” below, as well as the Citation Guide. 3 o ORGANIZATION: o Your paragraphs should all work together in support of your project/thesis. o Each paragraph should express /explore a central claim presented in a topic sentence. o The paragraphs should connect logically to each other, and to your larger project. o PRESENTATION: o Make sure your ideas, sentences, and paragraphs are clear, and your spelling and grammar are correct. o Follow the paper formatting guidelines above or you will be penalized. o Proofread carefully. o Check your work before submission to make sure there have been no formatting errors when printing. IMPORTANT INFORMATION ON SOURCES/CITATIONS AND PLAGIARISM: o All work must be in your own words (quotes excepted), and must be cited and documented appropriately. o Any time you rely on information from outside sources—whether you are quoting it directly or paraphrasing—YOU MUST CITE IT! o If you do not do so, this is PLAGIARISM (for which you must be reported to the Institute). o It does not need to be a direct quotation to need to be cited. o The use of the ideas of others or information gathered from a source, even if put into your own words, is plagiarism if you do not give proper attribution by citing. o If you do not understand how to do this, it is your responsibility to ask. o For a good resource on what constitutes plagiarism and how to avoid it see: o http://www(dot)plagiarism(dot)org/plagiarism-101/what-is-plagiarism o Your paper must include at least 5 citations in the form of footnotes. o Citations must include the specific page number you are referencing. o Your paper must use and cite at least 2 scholarly print sources. o These must be scholarly books or articles/essays, not websites, newspapers or general textbooks. o You cannot use websites except for the Metropolitan Museum website(s). o You can, however, download and use PDFs of scholarly articles (these are print sources) from resources like JSTOR (available through the library). o To find sources, start by checking the object pages for your works on the Met website. Good sources can often be found under the headings “references” and “Metpublications,” the later of which usually has links to freely available PDFs of books or articles that discuss the work. o In addition to the 2+ sources you can use the course textbook, the Metropolitan Museum website and Met Museum wall texts. o Wall text can be cited as follows: [note number] Wall text, Work Title, Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, NY. o For more information on how to properly cite sources: o See Citation Guide and http://www(dot)chicagomanualofstyle(dot)org/tools_citationguide.html 4 ORGANIZATION AND CONTENT OF THE PAPER: INTRODUCTION: o In the first paragraph introduce your choices of works of art (see list below). o Provide artists’ names (if relevant), and the works’ titles, dates, sizes, mediums, and subjects. o Explain clearly what will be the theme of your comparison. Have a thesis statement. o Note that titles of paintings must be italicized (not put in quotation marks): o For ex: The Mona Lisa not The “Mona Lisa.” BODY PARAGRAPHS: o In the following paragraphs (body paragraphs) make sure that the first sentence of each paragraph is a topic sentence that explains the subject of the paragraph and introduces it, and that all other sentences in the paragraph relate to that central issue. o If they do not, then they belong in another paragraph. Consider the following issues (not all are applicable to all works): o Think about the subject matter and discuss as relevant. o What does the medium tell us? o Does size tell us anything? o How is anatomy handled and poses employed? Describe the anatomy, poses and drapery. o If a statue, does it have one or several major viewpoints? o Which views appear to be the sculptor's primary focus? o If it is a relief, how is the scene composed? How is the background treated? o In painting think about figural arrangement and relationship to space. o Is a third dimension created? How? Is perspective being used? o In sculpture think about surface treatment: o drapery, patterns, texture, and overall relationship to the body, as applicable. o In painting think about drawing, color techniques, light and visual effects. o Think about if the works are naturalistic/ idealized/ abstract(ed). o What is the effect of each work? o What purpose/function did it serve? o How does each of these works reflect its respective creating culture? Be specific. o What can you notice only in person? Look at surface / medium / changes over time. o Indicate restorations and missing parts, as applicable. o Think about how they impact the work. o Analyze the works, do not write about your feelings about them. This essay is not about whether you like or dislike each work. CONCLUSION: o Conclude your paper with a final paragraph (conclusion) that clearly summarizes your findings and arguments. 5 A Few Do's and Do Nots: Do: o Take detailed notes at the museum to enable you to do the assignment. Remember you need to look closely at the works in person to properly do the assignment. o Be clear and concise in your writing. o Proofread carefully! I advise reading your paper out loud to more easily find mistakes. Do Not: o Include general comments about why you chose the set of works. o Jump randomly from one point to another. o Write long, meandering paragraphs with no organizing point. o Just describe each of the works. You must also analyze them and bring the works into a conversation with each other. o Use contractions (don't, can't, etc.)—These are not appropriate for a formal paper. METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART INFORMATION: LOCATION: 1000 Fifth Avenue New York, New York 10028-0198 HOURS: Sunday–Thursday: 10:00 a.m.–5:30 p.m.* Friday and Saturday: 10:00 a.m.–9:00 p.m.* *Galleries are cleared fifteen minutes before closing. ADMISSION: The $12 Student fee is OPTIONAL as you are current residents of NY. You should bring your ID to prove this, and state that you are NY state students. I suggest that you pay a little something ($1-$5) to keep the museum running (they are in bad financial shape), but do not feel obliged to pay the $12 fee. **When we go as a group, Pratt pays, so do not purchase tickets** 6 CHOOSE ONE SET OF WORKS AS YOUR TOPIC: Think about themes/connections when you consider each set of works. If you have trouble finding the works, please ask the museum employees for assistance. IMPORTANT: If you pick a work from a period about which we have not yet learned in class, make sure you read the relevant textbook chapter(s) before writing your paper, so that you understand and can discuss the key issues about the styles and periods you are considering. ___________________________________________________________________________ 1A Hatshepsut in a Devotional Attitude (28.3.18) Gallery 115 Egyptian Art, Dynasty 18, Ca. 1473-1458 BCE, Granite 1B Marble Statue of a Kouros (youth) (32.11.1) Gallery 154 Archaic Greek Art, ca. 590–580 BCE, Marble ___________________________________________________________________________ 2A Marble Statue of a Kore (Maiden) (07.306) Gallery 154 Archaic Greek Art, late 6th C. BCE, Marble 2B Marble Statue of a Wounded Amazon (32.11.4) Gallery 153 Classical Greek Art. Roman Marble Copy (1st–2nd century CE) of a bronze statue from ca. 450–425 BCE ___________________________________________________________________________ 3A Marble Portrait of the Emperor Antoninus Pius (33.11.3) Gallery 162 Roman Imperial (Antonine), ca. 138-161 CE, Marble 3B Head of an Oba (1979.206.86) Gallery 352 Benin (Edo Peoples), Nigeria. Brass. 16th century. ___________________________________________________________________________ 4A Section from a Qur’an Manuscript (2004.89) Gallery 454 Islamic (Made in Iraq), dated A.H. 588/ A.D. 1192–93 Ink, opaque watercolor, and gold on paper 4B Jaharis Byzantine Lectionary (2007.286) Gallery 303 Byzantine (Made in Constantinople), ca. 1100 CE Tempera, gold, and ink on parchment; leather binding ___________________________________________________________________________ 5A Reliquary Bust of Saint Yrieix (17.190.352a) Gallery 304 Gothic (French), ca. 1220-40 CE, Silver and gilded silver with rock crystal, gems and glass 5B Triptych with the Mandylion (1975.87) Gallery 303 Byzantine (from Russia after the fall of the Byzantine Empire), 1637 Oil paint, wood, silver, gilding, niello, enamel, sapphires, rubies, spinels, pearls, silk, velvet and leather (NOTE: in terms of style consider this as Byzantine) ___________________________________________________________________________

Essay Sample Content Preview:
Student’s Name
HAD 111-18
Instructor
Date
Comparing Hatshepsut in a Devotional Attitude and Marble Statue of a Kouros (Youth)
The statue of Hatshepsut in a Devotional Attitude (ca. 1479-1458) and The Marble Statue of a Kouros (youth) (590-680 BCE) are language statues belonging to Ancient Egypt and Ancient Greece respectively. The statues share a number of similarities and differ in some significant ways. The Hatshepsut in a Devotional Attitude is a statue made from granite and paint and it is approximately 8 feet tall and 2 feet vast. The statue is a figurine depicting the Egyptian King Tutmose 3’s wife queen Hatshepsut. The Marble Statue of a Kouros (youth) on the other hand is slightly over 6 feet tall and 20 inches wide. It is made from marble and depicts a naked male figure. The names of the artists responsible for creating these statues are not known. Generally, both statues have evidence of cultural influences and unrealistic postures, but show differences in the anatomy, medium and the purposes they served.
There is evidence of cultural influences in the two statues. Specifically, both statues were developed in line with their time and place of origin whereby the Egyptian artists focused on portraying deities and political figures while the Greek artists focused on representing real mortal beings. For example, the depiction of Hatshepsut is in line with the ancient Egyptian Pharaohs. Even though she was female, the statue presents her as a man king as seen from the false beard, the kilt, and the headdress, all of which were used in identifying the ancient Egyptian pharaohs. From her pose, it can be seen that her hands are open and rest on the kilt’s front in “a devotional gesture that was first used in statues of the Middle Kingdom pharaoh Senwosret III.” The cultural representations in this case are used to depict Hatshepsut as the ideal Egyptian king or pharaoh of that period. Kouros on the other hand, is presented in a more reasonable manner representing a typical athletic youth from ancient Greek. Ideally, the Ancient Greek artists largely focused on the depictions of youths who were in most cases shown standing and without any clothes. The Kouros Statue of a Kouros youth conforms to these artistic standards of the Greek artists. While the cultural elements are different in the two cases depending on their places of origin, it is evident that both statues have cultural influences.[Metropolitan Museum of Art, Hatshepsut in a Devotional Attitude (Np)]
Both statues have unrealistic postures that tend to make them appear rigid. Notably, this rigidity in posture gives the impression that there is no movement in the statues. The posture in both is very formal and they have a frontal gaze. As seen in both, the figurines of Hatshepsut and the Kouros have one of their legs in front of the other. In Hatshepsut’s case, the statue cannot move because of it being attached to a block. Similarly, in Kouros’ statue, the figure has a “rigid stance, with the left leg forward and arms at the side.” The erect manner that the statue stands and the frontal pose also add to this rigidity. The hips, shoulders and the waist are arranged in such a way that they are square to the...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These MLA Essay Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!