Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
3 pages/≈825 words
Sources:
No Sources
Style:
MLA
Subject:
History
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 10.8
Topic:

Film's Essential Role in Communicating the Society’s Values and Culture

Essay Instructions:
  1. Glorification of one’s own culture and customs is unavoidable when attempting to portray your collective identity as unique. However, can this glorification be accomplished without hurting the sentiments of other people’s customs? Does Anna and the King succeed in this regard, given that our heroine is a British teacher during the age of imperialism? Some would say that the distortion of history in a national film is perceived as patriotic, while the distortion in Anna and the King can be perceived as offensive. But what is the difference between the two? Essentially they accomplish the same goal – the alteration of historic events. Both are fiction. In the case of a nationalistic film, as well as a film done by Hollywood, individuals who never had any sway over the course of history are given way more significance than on record. Are the two then not fundamentally identical? Are they not two sides of the same coin, the coin of building ‘false truths’? Why then is the former more acceptable than the latter?
  2. Hollywood is notorious for inserting western characters in conflicts not their own and resolving them (i.e. Tom Cruise in The Last Samurai). Other film industries (such as Bollywood) are notorious for glorifying one’s own culture while vilifying those who don’t share it. Is this the case with Anna and the King or is the film fair in portraying all characters and cultures with equal respect? Is it authentic (at least so much as a film can be) to the time it is meant to be portraying?
  3. Finally, in your opinion can both reality and fiction work together? Does giving an eastern, western, or any other perspective make a culture more approachable for some and more distant for others? If that is the case than can it be said that the perspective in question can be useful for some, especially those unaware of the so called historical facts? Can history be subjective and if so, do we have the right to make it so, for whatever reason? Can the modern world be authentic to history and why can the entertainment industry never fully be true to history? Is that necessarily bad? 
Essay Sample Content Preview:
Student’s Name
Professor’s Name
Course
Date
Reflection Paper
Films, movies and other forms of literature play an essential role in communicating the society’s values and culture. Consequently, people are likely to associate a certain code of conduct to a specific society based on the information they have seen in a specific film. This trend is common in many western films, where the producers paints a certain image to a specific cultural group with an aim of either castigating the said society or glorifying their own. Sadly, the same case applies even in the media reporting, where the western media has a tendency of reporting what they want the public to believe about other cultures, rather than reporting the truth. It is worth noting that this glorification can be achieved without hurting the sentiments of other people’s customs.
Contrary to what some people believe, it is still possible to glorify one’s culture without hurting the sentiments of other people’s customs. Many of those societies that have been castigated as being bad eventually earn their respect when truth comes out. Representing the truth in both film and national TV allows people to accurately gauge the nature of a given culture. While Anna and the King succeeds in glorifying the role that the Anna, as the British woman, played in enlightening other women regarding their freedom, feminism, and monogamy, it does this at the expense of Anna’s real character. Distortion of history in a national TV is often perceived as patriotic because it all depends on the audience for which the said film is intended. The distortion on national TV appeases the audience whose culture is being glorified. On the contrary, distortion in film exposes the hypocrisy to a wide audience, who can see the distortions more clearly. Therefore, distortion on nationalistic TV is more acceptable before the eyes of the audience, who then glorify the characters, rendering the film as patriotic.
Hollywood is famous for distortion of cultures as a way of glorifying the western culture at the expense of others. In several of its films, there are cases where the western characters have been inserted in conflicts of different countries and resolving them with an aim of showing superiority against societies where the actual incidents happened and those communities were unable to resolve them. For example, a majority of the Hollywood films show the westerns as the main drivers of modernization. Borsa (2000, p. 151) posits that literature on modernization of ...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to values:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!