Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
3 pages/≈825 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
MLA
Subject:
History
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 10.8
Topic:

Written Analysis 1: Compare and Contrast. History Essay

Essay Instructions:

Written Analysis 1: Compare and Contrast
Learning Outcomes
After completing this essay, students will be able to:
compare the similarities in two artworks
contrast the differences in two artworks
identify the subject matter, function, materials, techniques, and style of a specific artwork.
Overview
The purpose of the compare and contrast essay is to apply what you have learned during the first five units into a formalized written work.
Procedure
Please choose one of the following pairs of slides found in your required textbook and write a formal essay comparing and contrasting them, following the guidelines below. Please note that this is NOT a research project. You should use your own brain, your text, and your notes. Your grade will be based on content (accuracy of information and thoroughness and thoughtfulness of your essay) and style (spelling and punctuation).
Chapter 3: The Temple of Amun (fig. 3.27) and Chapter 5: The Parthenon (fig. 5.40)
Chapter 4: Flotilla Fresco (fig. 4.10) and Chapter 5: Ajax and Achilles Playing a Game (fig. 5.25)
Chapter 5: Dying Warrior (fig. 5.23) and Chapter 5: Dying Gallic Trumpeter (5.71)
Chapter 5: Metropolitan Kouros (fig. 5.14) and Chapter 5: The Spear Bearer (fig. 5.33)
Chapter 5: Kore, from Chios (fig. 5.16) and Chapter 5: Nike of Samothrace (fig. 5.74)
Essay Requirements
1. Write your name and date at the top left of the page.
2. Identify your two images with the following:
o name of work
o structure where work appears (if applicable)
o artist or architect (if known)
o date
o culture
o country.
3. Write a 600 word essay that address the following:
o Paragraph 1 (Introduction): Introduce your topic. Provide a brief description of each of the works you’re writing about. (For example, The Woman of Willendorf is a small limestone figurine of a woman made during the Paleolithic period, while The Peplos Kore is a larger marble statue, also of a woman, made during the Archaic period of ancient Greece. Both of these works share similar subject matter, materials, and techniques; however, their styles are completely different.)
o Paragraph 2 (Subject Matter): (This does NOT apply to architecture.) Are there figures in the work? Do you know who they are? Are they kings or regular people? Does the work show a landscape? Are the subjects similar? Wildly different?
o Paragraph 3 (Materials and Techniques Used): (This paragraph is NOT about style.) What were the works made of? How were they made (e.g., repoussé, lost wax casting, post-and-lintel, subtractive, corbel dome)? Are the two works similar or different?
o Paragraph 4 (Function): What were the works used for? Was it for propaganda, religion, burial? Do they share similar functions? It is possible for a work to have more than one function.
o Paragraph 5 (Style): Are the works naturalistic? Stylized? Do they share similar styles? Describe the styles and compare them.o Paragraph 6 (Optional): Other comments might include observations about dimensions, locations, or any other information that doesn’t quite fit in the categories above that you’d like to mention.
o Paragraph 7 (Conclusion): What have you learned from your examination?What Not to Do
Do NOT write separate paragraphs about each work. You’re meant to COMPARE the traits, not just make two separate descriptions.
Use your own brain, notes, and text. Do NOT do outside research; it is not necessary.Submission and Due Date
1. Save a draft of your file in DOCX format, named as follows:o lastnamefirstinitial_writtenanalysis1draft.docxo for example, John Doe would name the file “doej_writtenanalysis1draft.docx”.2. Post a draft of your work for peer review to the appropriate Unit 4 discussion forum by 11:59 p.m. U.S. EST/EDT on Day 1 of Unit 4.3. Review your peers' work and provide constructive feedback by 11:59 p.m. U.S. EST/EDT on Due Day 7 Unit 4.4. Make necessary changes based on the feedback you received from your peers and instructor.5. Save a final version of your file in DOCX format, named as follows:o lastnamefirstinitial_writtenanalysis1final.docxo for example, John Doe would name the file “doej_writtenanalysis1final.docx”.6. Submit your final file via the Submissions link in the course menu by 11:59 p.m. U.S. EST/EDT on Day 7 of Unit 5.GradingWritten Analysis 1 will be graded according to the criteria specified in the Written Analysis 1 grading rubric, which can be found in Grades on the Course Menu. For details on grading, refer to the Syllabus.

Essay Sample Content Preview:

Written Analysis 1: Compare and Contrast
Name
Class Information
Due Date
The dying warrior is a sculpture representing a fallen hero. The pediment sculpture is believed to have been created between 505BC and 500 BC (“Janson's History of Art” 2012). The Greeks associated death in battle with honor. When a Greek warrior died in battle, therefore, he was believed to have become immortal. On the one hand, sculptures like the dying warrior were common in Greek cities. The dying gallic trumpeter, on the other hand, is a unique piece of artwork. The figure in the sculpture has been identified as a Gaul due to its wiry hair and neck ring. The sculpture was originally made of bronze and placed in the Sanctuary of Athena (“Janson's History of Art” 2012). Still, there is a replica of the sculpture that was retrieved from Julius Caesar’s garden. This again goes to show how unique and significant the sculpture was to the Romans.
Each of the two sculptures depicts singular figures. The dying warrior is a figure of a fallen Trojan hero. The dying gallic trumpeter is a sculpture of a dying Gaul. Both artworks are sculptures, hence, there are no landscapes. The figure in the dying warrior is believed to have been that of Laomedon (“Janson's History of Art” 2012).
Figure 1.1: The Dying Warrior (“Janson's History of Art” 2012).
According to Greek mythology, Laomedon was a Trojan King and the son of Ilus. The dying gallic trumpeter is believed to have been a regular person. In earlier accounts, historians noted that the sculpture was that of a gallic gladiator. The physique, hair, and the neck ring on the figure pointed to key gallic features (“Janson's History of Art” 2012). Also, in ancient Rome, Gauls were mainly used for gladiatorial combats, mining, or any other form of slavery. Yet, years later, historians began to recognize the sculpture as that of a dying gallic warrior. The subjects are, therefore, wildly different in terms of who they are and who they represent.
The dying warrior was made of marble. The backside was not visible to the human eye. However, it was also made of marble. This was a common practice among the Greeks. They believed that even though the back of a pediment sculpture was not visible to the human eye, it had to be finished with marble. Moreover, the backside was visible...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These MLA Essay Samples: