Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
2 pages/≈550 words
Sources:
2 Sources
Style:
Chicago
Subject:
Literature & Language
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 7.2
Topic:

English Engineer John Smeaton's Experimental Method

Essay Instructions:

please read this essay and write a response paper.
Please keep in mind that the response papers are supposed to be between 500-600 words long and demonstrate your understanding of the article, as well as your ability to critically engage with the material.
(1) read the posted rubric!
(2) your summary should consist of the most important details or points made in the article
(3) you need to clearly outline the author's main argument and the evidence the author uses to justify their argument
(4) the analysis SHOULD be longer than your summary. The analysis should critique the article, consider if the argument is convincing, whether the evidence used supports the argument, if there are ways the article or argument could be improved. You SHOULD also draw on other course material to improve your analysis, this will allow you to consider the significance of the article, its role within the historiography (secondary research), and consider the influence or affect on modern science and engineering.
please read the marking rubric and focus more on the analysis part! thank you!

Essay Sample Content Preview:

Response Paper
Name:
Course:
Date:
Response Paper
Summary
The article "English engineer John Smeaton's experimental method(s): Optimization, hypothesis testing, and exploratory experimentation" offers a definite explanation of the experimental methods of John Smeaton, who was an eighteenth-century engineer. Morris aimed at analyzing Smeaton's work based on the current research on philosophy and the history of science. The analysis of Smeaton's work begins with applying parameter variation and the objectives of the methodology he used in researching hydraulic mortars, windmills, and waterwheels. Morris identified the methodological targets as optimization, hypothesis testing, and generation. The article's primary objective is to explain why the work of Smeaton is not just limited to engineering methods, and Morris achieves this by arraying Smeaton's artisanal approaches. Morris argues that John's approach was instrumental in linking the disconnection between technology and science via integration of exploratory experimentation and test of hypothesis. Morris' point stems from how Smeaton accentuated his exploratory work on Philosophical Transactions. Morris discovers that the hypothesis test is congruent with exploratory experimentation through his research on Smeaton's work and other recent research related to the topic.[Andrew M. Morris, "English engineer John Smeaton's experimental method(s): Optimization, hypothesis testing and exploratory experimentation," Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 89 (2021): 284, doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.07.004.]
Argument
The primary argument of Morris is that Smeaton's approach bridged the disconnect between technology and science by applying both exploratory experimentation and hypothesis testing. Morris's argument is based on Smeaton's emphasis on his exploratory work on Philosophical Transactions, contrary to his attention on the architect of the Eddystone lighthouse. Morris's assertion on the connection between science and technology in Smeaton's work gets support from Musson and Robinson, who claimed that science played an integral role in the early industrial revolution. Morris also argues that the experimental approach used by Smeaton wa...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to standardized testing:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!