Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
4 pages/≈1100 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
APA
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 17.28
Topic:

MGT422 C-44. Vroom-Yetton Model. Social Sciences Essay

Essay Instructions:

Required Reading
The Vroom-Yetton model can be difficult to follow and understand at first, so be sure to go carefully through these three readings to develop a solid understanding of the model before you begin your assignments:
Rigolosi, E. (2005). Chapter 6: Diagnosing the task. Management and Leadership in Nursing and Health Care : An Experiential Approach. New York, NY, USA: Springer Publishing Company, 2005. [eBook Academic Collection.]
Vroom, V. (1976). Can leaders learn to lead? Organizational Dynamics, 4(3), 17-28. [ProQuest]
Gelles, D., & Michael J De La, M. (2014, Jun 05). T-Mobile and Sprint zeroing in on merger. New York Times [ProQuest]
Yao, D. (2014). Moody's: Sprint/T-Mobile merger faces negative free cash flow until at least 2018. SNL Kagan Media & Communications Report [ProQuest]
De La Merced, M. (2014, Aug 07). Sprint ends its attempt to purchase T-Mobile. International New York Times [ProQuest]

Since 2013 there has been on-and-off talk of Sprint purchasing T-Mobile. (They are the third- and fourth-largest mobile phone carriers in the United States.) This move is led by Masayoshi Son, the chair of Japanese conglomerate SoftBank, which owns Sprint. Mr. Son is a bold entrepreneur who is known for his penchant for risk taking and desire to be a global leader in the telecommunications industry. If the merger ever goes through it would result in a merger of the third and fourth largest mobile phone carriers in the United States.
Most recently, it appears that the merger will not go through. But the fact that talk of this merger has been rumored for quite a long time suggests it must have been a very difficult decision for Masayoshi Son. Such a large-scale merger brings great benefits in allowing a combined Sprint/T-Mobile to compete with industry leaders AT&T and Verizon. But mergers are always very risky and require a huge amount of debt to finance, not to mention overcoming numerous regulatory hurdles.
For this assignment, thoroughly review the background materials on the Vroom-Yetton decision-making style model. This involves answering seven questions relating to a decision and using the results from the model to determine your decision-making style. Make sure you understand the model, including the seven questions and the path diagram that you follow in order to find the preferred leadership style. The Vroom-Yetton model allows you to choose between different levels of autocratic, consulting, or group decision-making styles.
After you have reviewed the required background materials including Vroom (1976) and Rigolosi (2005), do some research on Sprint’s decision whether or not to purchase T-Mobile and think about what kind of answers you would give to the seven questions involved in the Vroom-Yetton model. Here are some articles on the rumored Sprint/T-Mobile merger to get you started:
Gelles, D., & De La Merced, M. J. (2014, Jun 05). T-Mobile and Sprint zeroing in on merger. New York Times [ProQuest]
Yao, D. (2014). Moody's: Sprint/T-Mobile merger faces negative free cash flow until at least 2018. SNL Kagan Media & Communications Report [ProQuest]
De La Merced, M. (2014, Aug 07). Sprint ends its attempt to purchase T-Mobile. International New York Times [ProQuest]
Once you have finished your research on the Vroom-Yetton model and on the merger, write a 4- to 5-page paper addressing the following issues:
1. Imagine you are Masayoshi Son and have to decide on which decision-making style to use. Go through the seven questions from the Vroom-Yetton model and give your answers based on what you think the main issues are in the decision of whether or not to purchase T-Mobile. Explain your reasoning behind each answer
2. Go through the diagram in the Vroom-Yetton model and, based on your answers to the seven questions from Question 1, see what kind of decision-making style is recommended for Masayoshi Son. Use the diagram (Figure 6.2) on page 118 of Rigolosi (2005). Are you surprised by this answer? Is it the kind of decision-making style you would personally recommend based on your own research?
3. Conclude your paper with a discussion of your own opinion as to the usefulness of the Vroom-Yetton model for choosing your decision-making style. Would you recommend that corporate executives receive training in this model? Is there any ways in which you think the model could be improved? Explain your reasoning.

Essay Sample Content Preview:
Vroom-Yetton Model
Name
Institution
Vroom-Yetton Model
The Vroom-Yetton model can be useful to understand some of the issues that arise that have made it challenging for Softbank to purchase T-Mobile. Based on question A on quality, the option is yes (Vroom, 1976). The importance of following regulatory bodies and the significance of the two companies involved in the discussions, in this case, Sprint and T-Mobile, means that there is a quality requirement whereby their several solutions in the current content. Both companies are ranked as the third and fourth largest firms in the US consecutively, and the merger will result in many changes in the industry and customer (De La Merced, 2014). The issue is that the regulatory bodies and antitrust commission do not support the merger due to the inherent risks that can arise, and this means that the current case has several options to choose from. For instance, it can be either going ahead with the merger or stopping the plans altogether. The merger will also mean that SoftBank will be faced with a more considerable amount of debt, and this is a factor that will also have to be considered during the decision-making process to determine the best solution to the issue.
For question B on managers information, the selection yes (Vroom, 1976). As the chairman of Softbank and owner of Sprint, this means that as the CEO, Son has sufficient expertise and evidence to make a high-quality decision. Considering that I have a history of initiating many new developments that have improved the Japanese telecommunications industry, this means I have the required skills and knowledge to make the best decision that will solve the problem. For question C in whether the problem is structured, the choice is no. The decisions regarding the issue is a qualitative assessment. The location of the required information to solve the current issue is unknown, and this leads to more issues. Since the merger has already been unsuccessful in previous attempts, and it does not see that it would be successful in future, then this means the solution is not known. The regulatory bodies and government are also ready to stop any effort by SoftBank to develop a new challenger to the two giants which exist in the telecommunications industry, AT&T, and Verizon. Even though the merger will mean that both companies will now be comparable to Verizon in regards to size, but the new developments only end there. As a result, the subjective problem only has a value judgment. For question D on whether acceptance of the decision by subordinates is needed for effective implementation, and the response is yes (Rigolosi, 2005). The case reveals that a previous merger between T-Mobile and AT&T was not successful since it led to distraction among employees and managers (Yao, 2014). The employees have to agree to the new changes before the merger become successful. Both companies have a large number of employees, and the merger means that they are exposed to uncertainties about their future and jobs. If the employees do not accept the new changes, then conflict or resistance can arise. In the current case, the merger has been falling since employers were not involved during the initial stages of planning the merger. Instead, i...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to scientific essays:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!