Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
2 pages/≈550 words
Sources:
5 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 17.28
Topic:

Working with Ethics & Diversity in Professional Practice Social Essay

Essay Instructions:

Harvard Referencing style, UK English style of writing.
The Reflective Commentary is a 1000 word written assignment where students introduce at least one theory of diversity and discuss how it has helped them to develop their own personal understanding of diversity. Students should refer to their reading in the Reflective Commentary by citing books, articles etc. and by providing a list of these references at the end using the Harvard format (see Course Handbook and Canvas). Students are required to attach three entries from their journal, as non-assessed evidence. They are asked to amend their original entries to anonymise any details that could breach confidentiality (their own, or others).


This assignment was locked 31 Jan at 14:00.


Students are required to keep a personal journal throughout this module. The journal is private and will not be seen by other students or staff. The purpose of this is threefold. Firstly, it provides a space for you to reflect on the personal impact of the material discussed in this module, and on the course as a whole. Secondly, it provides a means by which you can monitor and reflect on your progress on the course, especially during the first semester, where there can be huge shifts in perspectives.


Thirdly, making regular entries into your journal will assist in writing your Reflective Commentary at the end of semester one.


The Reflective Commentary is a 1000 word written assignment where students introduce at least one theory of diversity and discuss how it has helped them to develop their own personal understanding of diversity. Students should refer to their reading in the Reflective Commentary by citing books, articles etc. and by providing a list of these references at the end using the Harvard format (see Course Handbook and Canvas). Students are required to attach three entries from their journal, as non-assessed evidence. They are asked to amend their original entries to anonymise any details that could breach confidentiality (their own, or others).  The journal entries are not assessed.


The marks from the Reflective Commentary equate to half of the overall marks towards this module.


Please ensure you copy and paste the assignment front sheet to your essay. You can download it from here. (Links to an external site.)


Rubric


SW4003 Reflective Commentary 



Criteria



Ratings



Pts



This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeStructure & Presentation




10.0 Pts 


Full marks



0.0 Pts 


No marks




10.0 pts



This criterion is linked to a learning outcomePresentation: use of language, written English, referencing & effective use of ICT




10.0 Pts 


Full marks



0.0 Pts 


No marks




10.0 pts



This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeIdentifies appropriate theory & applies it to own development




45.0 Pts 


Full marks



0.0 Pts 


No marks




45.0 pts



This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeAppropriately reflects on diversity and professional responses to discrimination




35.0 Pts 


Full marks



0.0 Pts 


No marks




35.0 pts



This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeInclusion of three (anonymised) diary entries




0.0 Pts 


Full marks



0.0 Pts 


No marks




0.0 pts



Total points: 100.0



SW4003 Reflective Commentary




Bottom of Form



Before you can submit assignments directly from Google Drive you need to authorise Canvas to access your Google Drive account:


Authorise Google Drive access


 


Essay Sample Content Preview:
DIVERSITY IN PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
Student’s Name
Course
Professor’s name
Institutional Affiliation
State (City)
Date
Diversity in Professional Practice
Diversity comprises of the differences that express the uniqueness among people, including mental ability, age, physique, socioeconomic status, gender, religion, nationality, language, ethnicity, and race, among other human characteristics (Patel, Tabb, and Sue, 2017, p. 7). In the more profound understanding of diversity in professionalism, considerations are made for the things we are not as well as those that we are. For instance, in the context of race, referring to someone as being a Black implies that they are not from the white race. Various theories by scholars and researchers have been essential in the comprehension of diversity and its overall presentation, which may be through an organizational-economical approach or the social-ethical perspective.
Social Cognitive Theory
This theory elucidates how diversity may give rise to adverse outcomes within an organization or a group of people (Nabi and Prestin, 2017, p. 8). Further, it asserts that people employ the use of categorization, which, to simplify and contend with a tremendous amount of information. Also, grouping aids in quick and easy data compartmentalization. Some of the visible characteristics which help in the formation of the categories include age, gender, and race, among others. Therefore, at the sight of a specific gender, beliefs, and automatic processing for the seen gender gets aroused. This approach has often come in handy, for instance, in the sorting of application documents where recruitment managers rely on the names to make guesses on people's gender.
Categorization is characterized by stereotyping, and the group attributes are significantly overgeneralized. In the context of merit (as in job applications), discrimination and prejudice stem from stereotyping and categorization. Consequently, the laws in many nations include chapters that support the implementation of affirmative action in the hiring process for both government and private entity jobs. There could be, for instance, rules that people employed in certain senior positions must consist of a third of each gender. Such regulations seek to reduce the retrogressive impacts of discrimination that consistently emanate from diversity in the form of gender.
Cognitive Diversity Hypothesis
While particular research works show that there is a lack of a correlation between group performance and diversity, others support the argument that a significant relationship (positive or negative) does exist. The theory concentrates on the differences existing among members of a team in the lines of experience or expertise. Many schools of thoughts support the impression that bio-demographic diversity (arising from characteristics in physical difference like gender, age, or race) may enhance performance because of the aspect of the unique cognitive attribute that comes from members of a team (Parayitam and Papenhausen, 2016, p. 3).
However, according to the cognitive diversity theory, it is imperative to acknowledge the inconsistencies that occasionally present. For example, culturally homogeneous groups typically o...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to stereotyping:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!