Addressing an Ethical Dilemma as a Utilitarian, Deontologist, and a Virtual Ethicist

Ethics in Workplace
Name
Department, Institution Affiliation
Course Code; Course Name
Instructor's Name
Date
Ethics in Workplace
Based on the provided case, ethics and integrity are key aspects in the workplace, especially when dealing with the disabled. However, the major aspect that jeopardizes ethics in the workplace is inadequate information (WSS, n.d.). Ethical dilemmas in the workplace are critical since they would impact one's identity adversely or positively. Regardless of the type of work, such as free-for-service, work ethic is paramount and involves the belief in diligence. Proponents of strong work ethics believe that integrity is the first element one should consider before providing any logical information that may jeopardize their position in the workplace (PCU, 2020b). Individuals with strong work ethics embody unique logic and principles, which implies positive work behavior. They tend to use formal logic by sorting good arguments from bad ones (Magnus, 2005). Besides, the proponents of strong work ethics also make deductive reasoning by considering validity in their approach to contingent problems. Such reasoning aims to identify specific logics and invalid arguments which may jeopardize work ethics. Therefore, work ethics is a special aspect that allows one to embrace integrity and positively intervene in any ethical dilemma that may impact their work behavior. Based on the provided case, the major ethical dilemma is to lower integrity by providing untruthful information for meeting personal obligations or providing truthful information and failing to meet personal obligations. The paper provides specific reasons for addressing the ethical dilemma by taking different positions as a utilitarian, deontologist, and virtual ethicist.
Working on the Dilemma as Utilitarian
The provided dilemma is resolvable as a utilitarian by focusing on utilitarian ethics. As a utilitarian, the decision will be based on the outcomes. Utilitarianism is a theory that focuses on moral ethics by determining the wrong or right (PCU, 2020a). It is based on the consequences that would result whenever one makes certain decisions. Therefore, as a utilitarian, more focus would be on the real information and not adjust any working hours. The decision is reliable since it would not jeopardize integrity regardless of not meeting personal obligations. Utilitarianism is significant since it is based on moral reasoning. It assists in predicting the consequences in the future and limiting uncertainties. The utilitarian approach is the most significant in making valid decisions and resolving ethical dilemma since one avoid a direction with negative consequences. It conforms to personal feelings whether a decision is right or wrong. It also provides a balance of good and bad feelings on specific decisions. The decisions made from the Utilitarian approach must show deductive and specific reasons for choosing a certain direction. Whenever individuals decide on a utilitarian approach, they will also ensure that their decision is justifiable and reliable. Therefore, it is majorly based on validity.
Additionally, less immediate and immediate consequences will be paramount to resolving the dilemma from a utilitarian approach. For ins...