Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
11 pages/β‰ˆ3025 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
APA
Subject:
Management
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.K.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 47.52
Topic:

Intergovernmental Organizations: World Trade Organizations and International Monetary Fund

Essay Instructions:

3000 words international organization

“Select two organisations from the list below. Describe, compare and contrast their respective approaches to decision-making, enforcement and accountability. Using relevant contemporary examples to illustrate your arguments, critically evaluate the effectiveness of their respective approaches.”

 

•Indicative length: 3,000 words (± 10%)
•Deadline: 1pm BST, Friday 23rd April 2021
•Late submissions will not be marked unless there are extenuating circumstances with documentary evidence
•Submission via ‘Turnitin’ dropbox on CampusMoodle
•Dropbox instructions will be provided on CampusMoodle
•Dropbox will close promptly on the deadline, so do not leave submission until the last minute!

 

 

•Helpful to break the question down:
1.Select two international governmental organisations
2.Define the criteria and their importance
3.Apply these criteria in detail to each of the two chosen IGOs
4.Explore key points of comparison / contrast
5.Illustrate effectiveness using recent examples

 

 

•Possible organisations:
•International Monetary Fund (IMF)
•World Trade Organisation (WTO)
•UN Security Council
•North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)
•Need to introduce key evaluation criteria and their relevance:
•Decision-making
•Enforcement
•Accountability
•What do they mean, and why are they important in the context of (evaluating) IGOs?
•Refer back to relevant literature discussed in lectures
•Applying the criteria:
•How does decision-making work in each organisation?
•How is the organisation able to enforce its rules, decisions etc., and in what ways does it try to make its members comply with these?
•How does accountability operate (if at all) in each organisation?
4. Explore key points of comparison / contrast
•Need to show areas of similarity / difference between the two organisations in respect of the three criteria:
•Decision-making
•Enforcement
•Accountability
•What key similarities / differences can be seen in terms of the two organisations’ procedures for the above criteria?
•Compare / contrast justifications for approaches?
5. Evaluate strengths / weaknesses
•Need to evaluate strengths and weaknesses of different approaches using relevant contemporary examples
•In other words, how do these IGOs’ choices in these key areas influence the outputs they produce?
•How might alternative approaches affect these outputs?
•No strict time-limit for ‘contemporary’, but do try to use examples which are as recent as possible
Structure
•Different options for structuring ‘performance’ section:
•Preferred option is to structure by organisation:
•IGO 1 (discuss criteria and effectiveness etc.) then…
•IGO 2 (discuss criteria and effectiveness etc.)
•Compare and contrast as you go along, or at the end
•Alternative approach is to structure by criteria:
•Decision-making (IGO 1, IGO 2, effectiveness etc.) then…
•Enforcement (IGO 1, IGO 2, effectiveness etc.) then…
•Accountability (IGO 1, IGO 2, effectiveness etc.)
•Some tips re. housekeeping:
•Submissions must be in Microsoft Word or PDF format
•Harvard referencing is essential – you will be marked down for not using this (see CampusMoodle for guide)
•Structured essay format
•Numbered pages
•12 point font, 1.5 line spacing
•All tables / figures to be numbered and titled e.g. “Figure 1: GPD per capita (BBC, 2016)”
Sources
•Possible sources of information:
•Core bibliography in module handbook
•Search databases / key shelfmarks
•Journal articles
•Media reports
•Organisational websites
•Remember that not all sources are of equal merit / value!
•Stage 4 essays should engage with a good number and spread of sources
Grade structure
•Grade Structure:
•A: 70% and over (excellent)
•B: 60-69% (commendable)
•C: 50-59% (good)
•D: 40-49% (satisfactory)
•E: 35-39% (borderline)
•F: 0-34% (fail)
•NS: non-submission
More details available in Module Handbook
Essay Sample Content Preview:

International Organizations
Student’s Name or Students’ Names
Department Affiliation, University Affiliation
Course Number: Course Name
Instructor’s Name
Assignment Due Date
International Organizations
Introduction
Intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) are among the most important hallmarks of globalization as they facilitate cross-border interactions among different countries to help realize mutual global objectives. One of the aspects of globalization in which the IGOs have had a significant impact is international trade. International trade has been on the rise in recent years, primarily due to globalization and the trade treaties signed among different countries to promote trade by removing barriers to international trade. Multinational companies and NGOs are at the forefront of international trade.
The three main perspectives of international trade include the Liberals, mercantilists, and structuralists, who have different views and opinions regarding how trade should be conducted on the international scene. For liberalists, international trade should be conducted using the ideas of thinkers such as the ideas of Smith and Ricardo. They give various conditions within which the trade can flourish in the international arena. In Ricardo's theory of comparative advantage, he provided liberal ideas about how trade can flourish between countries using their strengths and weakness in terms of their production of goods and services. According to both Ricardo and Smith, global trade should not be based on who can produce the most of any given product since this can be disadvantageous for businesses due to the limitations of scarce resources. This limitation means that no particular country can produce as much as it wants of all goods and services; opportunity cost must therefore be considered. Absolute advantage cannot, therefore, be relied on as a policy for international trade. On the other hand, comparative advantage is the best policy because it allows countries to produce whatever they can produce efficiently and then get the other products from other countries or businesses that also have a comparative advantage in producing such products and services.
International organizations such as the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) have been at the forefront of policy development in the area of international trade while also offering support to governments to help them build their competitive advantages by enhancing their local industries. This report focuses on the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) as the two major organizations involved in fostering good governance, development, and effective policies in international trade. The report analyzes and compares the two organizations in terms of their decision-making processes, enforcement, and accountability.
Defining the Criteria
This report will use three main perimeters of decision-making, enforcement, and accountability to effectively compare the two intergovernmental organizations by highlighting their strengths and weaknesses.
Decision Making
The decision-making process in intergovernmental organizations is important because such decisions have far-rea...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples: