What are Mustapha Mond’s arguments against freedom? Is there any validity to them? Do you think there is a “winner” of his debate with John?

What are Mustapha Mond’s Arguments against Freedom? Is there any validity to them? Do you think there is a ‘winner’ of his debate with John?
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
 
What are Mustapha Mond’s Arguments against Freedom? Is there any validity to them? Do you think there is a ‘winner’ of his debate with John?
The Brave New World as a novel unravels the paradoxical mystery of the worlds. It is a thought-provoking book that highlights contrasting perspectives and school thoughts in life. Freedom and religion are some of the features that permeate through expositions by Mustapha Mond and John and become the climax of the discussion. Mustapha Mond opines that freedom is not necessary, and he believes that control will ensure stability, though he is sceptical of religion. John chooses freedom at the cost of control. The two stands seem to complement each other because it is impossible to survive in a world where there are absolute freedoms and religion or lack of the two aspects; there is a need to strike a balance between the ideal worlds.
Mustapha Mond feels that we can gain stability if we do away with freedom, but he contends with implications that are associated with a lack of freedom. These adversities include the possibility of disease, misery, and starvation. Mond argues that control, which has an element of suppressed freedom, is the bedrock of happiness and peace. Brave New World presents freedom through structures that obliterate freedom. There are many instances in life where there is a need to have control. For example, authorities may have to regulate the utilization of technology in a bid to ensure that there is a net benefit in society. Mond believes in a pragmatic community that aims to generate a significant ...