Is gun control an effective method of reducing crime?

Is Gun Control an Effective Method of Reducing Crime?
Name
Institution
Date
Is Gun Control an Effective Method of Reducing Crime?
The question of whether gun control is an effective method of reducing crime does not require the genius mind to obtain an answer. Countries with strict rules on accessing guns have similar rates of violent just like those countries without stringent measures on firearms. Some believe that extremely tight gun control laws will eliminate crime. However, the law only prevents the good and vulnerable guys from improving their security. Psychologists will need no substantial evidence to prove that crimes reside in mind. Criminals with the hideous motive of committing a crime will have ways of getting weapons, whether it be from hiring experts to assemble the firearms under their presence or black market. Introducing gun control policy will not deter their criminal plans. In respect to this, the essay herein will discuss why gun control is not an effective method of reducing crimes.
Removing the weapons from the public is a terrible mistake and falling in the trap of the criminals. More good often comes from owning a weapon than bad. The good members of the public are capable of stopping crimes in progress when they have armed than when they are denied the right to access the firms. Moreover, fighting terror even in public institution and malls becomes easier when the public are armed than when they are disarmed. Disarming the public makes them more vulnerable and dependents of government security agencies. England for instance, reports high cases of home invasions, robberies and other crimes because the public is restricted from accessing weapons (Lott, 2013). Removing the guns from the hands of the public will centralize the security matters, thus mandating the national government to respond in case of an attack. This policy will make the public more vulnerable to criminals who are ever ready to release their homicide activities.
Gun control advocates and proponents are misinformed between the crime and owning a gun. Crimes are not subjected to gun control. States with strict gun laws, like California, reports high cases of gun-related homicides and crimes than states with loose gun laws (Weisburd, Telep, Hinkle, & Eck, 2010). This claim is true since the attackers are pretty sure that their target has little security attached to them. Banning firearms from the public will not influence the destined aim of criminal to own more illegal weapons. The banning policy only denies the innocent and law abiding citizens the right to counterattack the criminals. In other words, guns in the hands of the law abiding citizens can be used to stop crime and save a life.
The argument by gun control proponents that firearms are involved in massive human deaths is unsubstantiated. Ideally, guns can kill but what if the gun holder is trying to protect his or her life? Banning guns from the public is a schem...