Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
6 pages/≈1650 words
Sources:
3 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Life Sciences
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 23.76
Topic:

Philosophy of War & Peace

Essay Instructions:

Answer ONE of the following questions:
Do you prefer Just War theory, Political Realism, or some combination of the two? Potential sources include Orend and Walzer for Just War theory, and Hobbes, Morgenthau, and Korab-Karpowicz for Political Realism. (Unit 1-2; Unit 3, sec.1-2)
Should we take a Consequentialist or Contractarian approach to international conflict like many Political Realists? Or hold with the Just War theorists that there are Deontological constrains governing warfare? (Unit 1, sec.6-7; Unit 2, sec.1-4, 9-10)
Do you agree with Walzer's doctrine of the Moral Equality of Soldiers? Are judgments of whether a war is fought justly in terms in jus in bello independent from whether the war has just cause in terms of jus ad bellum? Should we blame soldiers who fight for unjust causes? How does this relate to the debate between Individualist and Collectivist accounts of war? (Unit 3, sec.1-2; Unit 4, sec.7-9)
What is the most dangerous cause of war: Fear, Gain, Honour, or Ideology? You may rank them, arguing why some are more important. Or argue that some are more relevant to particular historical contexts or types of conflict. You are encouraged to discuss other causes of war that you see as important. Note that Brodie's "Some Theories on the Causes of War" is available through course reserves. (Unit 3, sec.5-7)
Was the Area Bombing of Hamburg justified in the context of 1943? What do you take to be the strongest arguments for and against? If you write on this topic, I suggest you skip ahead and read Unit 7, sec.1-2, featuring Walzer's discussion of Supreme Emergency and the decision to bomb German cities. (Unit 3, sec.8-9)
Defend your own view of the Right to Self-Defence and the Duty of Other Defence, drawing on theories and hypothetical cases presented, as well as your own thinking. (Unit 4, sec.2-4; Frowe, ch.1)
Argue a thesis based on the Songs About War. This could involve relating the lyrics of several songs to theories about the morality of war, comparing or criticizing ideas in the songs, showing how different themes reflect different historical eras, or researching additional songs. (Unit 1, sec.1)
Write on a topic of your own choosing. Your essay must engage with course material, and it should develop and defend a position or critically assess the views of authors on a debatable issue. You are welcome to discuss your topic with me. (Units 1-4)
General Advice on Writing Philosophy Essays:
I'm looking for knowledge of the relevant course material, understanding and evaluation of the arguments involved, and some original and coherent thinking. Style is relevant. This involves such things as clarity, organization, grammar, and spelling.
The essay is a defence of your own position regarding a question of ethical significance. To give your position a worthy defence, imagine that your reader is skeptical about your conclusion but sympathetic to well formulated arguments. When arguing against a position, imagine how your opponent would reply.
Strong argumentation and originality of thought are highly valued in philosophy papers. This could involve subtle and detailed analysis of an issue, concept, or author, and it could involve comparing or connecting different ideas in order to develop your own view. Accuracy in your treatment of texts is also important. As a reader, I want you to give me the most for the least - that is, to make lots of points, defend them adequately, back them up with appropriate attention to course material, and to do this without padding or repetition.
Marks will be deducted for poor writing (paragraph organization, grammar and diction), so proofread carefully. I also come down hard on papers that clearly misread an author, that are self-contradictory, or that say little in a vague way.
All ideas taken from someone else should be referenced in MLA or APA format, even if they are not direct quotations. Page references should be given for all direct quotations from a printed source.
Important:
You might need my lecture slide for this essay, but I can not download it, so I will give you my university account so you can login and check, each question is followed by which unit or section
You might need my lecture slide for this essay, but I can not download it, so I will give you my university account so you can LOGIN and check, each question is followed by which unit or section
LOGIN website: https://mylearningspace(dot)wlu(dot)ca/d2l/LOGIN?noRedirect=1&sessionExpired=1&target=%2fd2l%2fhome
user name: ASK SUPPORT
PASSword: ASK SUPPORT
when you at the website, don't LOGIN there, above that you will see something like (Laurier Students, Staff and Faculty: If you have a Laurier email account, please click here to LOGIN. ), click"click here", it will lead you to the LOGIN page, after you LOGIN, go to the top right corner, at the left side of the mail icon, click that, and click" PP-230-OC2 - Philosophy of War & Peace", once you click it, select "content" and scroll down and take a look at left side, you will find "Course Notes".

Essay Sample Content Preview:

Philosophy of War and Peace
Student Full Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course Full Name
Professor Full Name
Due Date
Philosophy of War and Peace
Question 1
Introduction
A just war theory is a philosophy used to illustrate how wars should be conducted and why a country should go to war with another nation. I prefer the just war theory because it has been effective in the past years. This essay aims to demonstrate the just war theory and its use in war zones. The theory is divided into two categories: the right to go to war (jus ad Bellum) and proper conduct in war (Jus in Bello). People in the field use the two sets of criteria to decide how they will conduct themselves on the battlefield. For example, it stipulates how prisoners of war are supposed to be treated. It also emphasizes the kind of weapons that are supposed to be used.
Philosophy of War and Peace
Right to Go to War (Jus Ad Bellum) 
Each country has a right to go to war as long as the war is justified. Before a nation goes to war, it must observe both jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello. The two criteria for going to war are essential because they ensure a country adheres to international conventions. A nation will also get the international community's support if it has observed the two criteria (Frowe, 2015). Several things fall under jus ad Bellum or the right to war. To begin with, a country has to prove that there is a just cause for waging war against another nation. In the case of the USA going to Afghanistan, it claimed that the Afghan government gave terrorists a safe ground to operate (Keichiro, 2016). Therefore, the reason for going to war has been to correct some wrong and not merely for revenge. It is also critical to take measures to make sure the safety of the civilians is taken into consideration.
Additionally, there is a need to have comparative justice when a country decides to wage war against another nation. According to this theory, although both sides may commit some wrongs and rights during the conflict, people need to consider which side was affected mainly by the use of force from the other party. Furthermore, for a war to be considered "just," only those in authority have the mandate of waging war (Keichiro, 2016). However, not all people in authority are considered individuals who can decide to go to war. Dictators and other despots do not fit into this category because they are not considered people who have the mandate of the people (Lieblich, 2020). Therefore, a dictator who wages war against another country is deemed to violate the just war criteria.
Furthermore, a war will only be considered just if it has the right intentions. A country can use force on another nation to prove to the world community that its intentions are right and aim to correct some wrong done to a particular group of people (Frowe, 2015). If there is any material gain or a country aims at maintaining its economic benefits derived from the attacked country, the war cannot be justified as being just. An example of a war considered just by NATO was the no-fly zone applied in Libya during the Arab uprising. According to NATO, going to fight in the country was to prevent the bloodshed of the civilians by Gadhafi'sthe regime (Keichiro, ...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to war essays:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!