Assignment 3: The Big Stage Final Report to Prosecution Law Essay

The Big Stage
Name
Institution
The Big Stage
Final Report to Prosecution
The final report of prosecution is important to summarize the facts of the case. Hess and Orthmann (2009) say that in the final report, the prosecutor has to identify the key elements of the case and the most reliable evidence that is meant to prove every element of the case. For example, a timeline of a crime, specific actions of the defendant, and evidence that show the guilt of the defendant. Further, the report has also to show facts or information that is favorable to the defendant. This ensures that the prosecutors are aware of the defense that is likely to be employed by the defendant. Therefore, the report shows how to counter the defendant’s facts or information in favor of the prosecution. A well written final report ensures that everyone involves in the case such as the judges or the jury have a clear understanding of the facts of the case increasing the chances of prosecuting (Hess & Orthmann, 2009, p. 88).
A poorly completed final report on the prosecution of a case would make it difficult for a prosecutor to prosecute. First, the parties involved in the case would view the report in a negative light and may not take its content with much seriousness. For example, a judge may not find it appealing that a prosecutor has to keep explaining omissions, errors, or points of confusion in a report. Further, a poorly written report invites criticism from the defense and in so doing, strengthens the defense case (Hess & Orthmann, 2009).
Stages of the Criminal Justice Process
The criminal justice process follows these steps for a successfully litigated action:-
Investigation – This is the process of gathering evidence to determine the events of, and the individuals involved in the crime. The investigation may require things such as a search or fact-finding inspection of a person or property. However, for such a search to be done, probable cause must be present in that there are facts that indicate evidence of criminality that warrants investigation (Siegel & Worrall, 2016).
Arrest – after the investigation, a person is taken into custody. Probable cause must be available for an arrest to be made. This means that a reasonable connection has been made between the person or suspect and the particular crime.
Adjudication – The adjudication begins with the prosecution of the criminal defendant by a district attorney. A preliminary hearing is held to determine if enough evidence exists to begin a trial. An indictment by a grand jury or the filing of a case by the prosecutor is done. After the induction, the suspect is arraigned in court before a judge and enters a plea either guilty or not guilty. There is a pretrial detention of the suspect for serious crimes such as murder or a bail paid by the defendant so that he or she can be appearing in court on his own where the offenses are not very serious (Siegel & Worrall, 2016).
Sentencing – if the defendant is found guilty, even if not on all counts, the punishment is passed by a judge or jury depending on jurisdiction. After the sentencing, if the defendant is not pleased with the punishment, one can appeal.
Corrections &ndash...