His159 work 2.The Making of an International Human Rights Movement.

Katherine M. Marino, Feminism For the Americas: The Making of an International Human Rights Movement. Chapel Hill: UNC Press, 2019.
Consider the relevance of the following concepts: Feminism, Autonomy, Coalition Building and Maternalism in Katherine M. Marino’s historical monograph, Feminism For the Americas: The Making of an International Human Rights Movement (2019). Identify the author’s central argument and at least one reason why it is significant. In other words, what is the book’s main contribution to understanding this historical moment?
{HINT a good place to find the book’s central thesis is in the introduction!}
The subsequent chapters are framed around six different women leaders. For your chosen chapter, how did the leader at the center of your chapter understand or define these concepts? Was her understanding at odds with other leaders? How are these concepts reflected in the organizing strategies she pursued? What did you understand as her primary goal or the central struggle guiding her work?
You do not need to develop an exhaustive response covering all four concepts but you should develop a focused argument based around one or two of them.
Remember this is a short, but formal piece of critical writing that should be organized in paragraphs with topic sentences and proper citations. Give it a title in the subject line of your post.

READING QUESTIONS (HINT these will also form the basis of our Zoom discussions this week)
Here are some questions to guide your reading of Feminism for the Americas. They are aimed at helping you develop your skills at critically evaluating scholarly work:
Why did Katherine Marino write this book? What was it a corrective to?
What contributions does the book make to the field?
What is feminismo americano? Why does it matter?
What kinds of sources, archives, and evidence does the author use to prove her point? What kinds of information do these documents contain?
What are the limitations of using these kinds of historical documents?
Is the writing style clear and effective?
Does the book/chapter raise important or provocative issues or topics for discussion?
Does the book/chapter bring attention to the need for further research?
What has been left out?