Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
2 pages/≈550 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
APA
Subject:
History
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 7.2
Topic:

Analyzing Artworks and Portraits History Essay Paper

Essay Instructions:

ARH 343 midterm exam: please answer both questions and submit your answers via the Blackboard link. Please save a copy of your exam in case there are any technical problems with Blackboard.

1. Earlier this semester, I asked you to read 3 different articles on Jan van Eyck’s Arnolfini Portrait – by Linda Seidel, Margaret Koster, and Craig Harbison. Each offered a different argument about the meaning and content of this mysterious portrait. Please summarize generally each author’s argument (give no more than four sentences for each summary), and then say which argument you find most convincing and why. This second part (where you say which argument you find most convincing and why) can be as many sentences as you wish. But, as mentioned, you can think of this exam as akin to an in-class exam, and you should write about as much as you’d write for an in-class exam essay question. Feel free to look back at your notes, the textbook, or at the articles, but please use your own words to answer this. Do not summarize the authors’ arguments by repeating their own words or by quoting them at length.

2. The artworks we’ve looked at in this class very often contain details that are incredibly realistic. But we’ve also seen a number of works that present elements that depart dramatically from reality: e.g., unnaturally elongated or large or angular bodies, unnaturalistic backgrounds, odd spatial configurations, unusual colors, impossible poses. Discuss why artists sometimes departed dramatically from reality. How do such departures from reality enrich the meaning of artworks? To answer this, discuss four works, and for each provide no more than five sentences. Feel free to pick whatever examples you prefer from the material we discuss through class on October 8. But some works you might consider discussing include (in Snyder’s textbook): the painting on p. 2 (the Resurrection by the Master of Trebon Altarpiece); figure 2.22 (the Lamentation in the Rohan Hours); figure 2.37 (April in the Très Riches Heures du Duc de Berry); figure 5.11 (van Eyck’s Madonna in the Church); figure 6.8 (van der Weyden’s Deposition); figure 7.6 (Petrus Christus’s Virgin and Child in a Chamber). Again, these are just suggestions; there are other works you can also pick that are superb examples.

Essay Sample Content Preview:

Analyzing Artworks and Portraits
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course Number and Name
Instructor’s Name
Assignment Due Date
Analyzing artworks and portraits
Artists have used various paintings, drawings, and sculptures to bring their creativity and imagination into reality. Throughout history, artworks and portraits have been unearthed, which have invoked different views and reactions from art critics and historians. The arguments and artworks below are but a scratch on the surface of the minds of various artists.
The Arnolfini portrait has sparked a lot of reactions from various art critics and has been quite controversial. Linda Seidel based her opinions majorly on her feminist stand and went the extra mile of apologizing for this action. However, she sheds light on various historical practices illustrated by the portrait, such as marriage and politics. Furthermore, Linda portrays the role and nature of early European artwork by showing how art can be scrutinized many years after making.
Margaret Koster also takes a shot in illuminating various aspects she draws from the painting. She points out how delicate life is and the certainty of death, rather than focusing on marriage. Koster’s view brings out a melancholy mood as she feels the painting is a way to honor the woman in the portrait assumed dead.
Lastly, Craig Harbison also gives us an in-depth explanation of what he thinks about the portrait. Craig points us in the direction of marriage, but rather focuses on the reason for marriage and the position and the duties of the wife in the society. He encompasses fertility and pregnancy topics, particularly recognizing the issue of sexuality, which has not been emphasized by the others.
In my view, the argument that seems more convincing would be from Linda Seidel. She depicts every possible aspect surrounding the portrait. She illustrates the plain meaning of the picture, which, in my case, is marriage. Although the other art historians put up a strong argument, Linda's view comes out on top as it includes all that they have expressed and more. Whether it is the gender roles in the society, the sanctity, ...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to gay marriage:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!