Nursing: Experience and Health Assessment

Assessment Description
Complete a written reflection (250-350 words) on what you learned during this topic. Include the following in your reflection, considered through the lens of a nurse educator.
Think about an experience you have encountered when viewing or completing the particular assessment.
Describe the steps you took when completing this particular assessment.
Discuss difficulties that could potentially arise or specific questions related to completing this type of assessment.
Include illustrative examples of potential strategies used to overcome the difficulties encountered when completing the particular assessment.
Describe how the Christian worldview and compassion for all play a role in this type of assessment.
APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected
RUBRIC
Rubric
Reflection Experience
3.5 points
Criteria Description
Reflection Experience
5. 5: Excellent
3.5 points
A description of the experience the student encountered when viewing the assessment is extremely thorough and includes substantial detail.
4. 4: Good
3.22 points
A description of the experience the student encountered when viewing the assessment is complete and includes supporting detail.
3. 3: Satisfactory
3.08 points
A description of the experience the student encountered when viewing the assessment is included but lacks supporting detail.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
2.8 points
A description of the experience the student encountered when viewing the assessment is incomplete or incorrect.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description of the experience the student encountered when viewing the assessment is not included.
Difficulties
3.5 points
Criteria Description
Difficulties
5. 5: Excellent
3.5 points
A discussion of the specific difficulties or questions that student has pertaining to the specific part of the assessment is extremely thorough and includes substantial detail.
4. 4: Good
3.22 points
A discussion of the specific difficulties or questions that student has pertaining to the specific part of the assessment is complete and includes supporting detail.
3. 3: Satisfactory
3.08 points
A discussion of the specific difficulties or questions that student has pertaining to the specific part of the assessment is included but lacks supporting detail.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
2.8 points
A discussion of the specific difficulties or questions that student has pertaining to the specific part of the assessment is incomplete or incorrect.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
A discussion of the specific difficulties or questions that student has pertaining to the specific part of the assessment is not included.
Christian Worldview
1.5 points
Criteria Description
Christian Worldview
5. 5: Excellent
1.5 points
A description of how the Christian worldview and compassion for all plays a role in this type of assessment is extremely thorough and includes substantial detail.
4. 4: Good
1.38 points
A description of how the Christian worldview and compassion for all plays a role in this type of assessment is complete and includes supporting detail.
3. 3: Satisfactory
1.32 points
A description of how the Christian worldview and compassion for all plays a role in this type of assessment is included but lacks supporting detail.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
1.2 points
A description of how the Christian worldview and compassion for all plays a role in this type of assessment is incomplete or incorrect.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description of how the Christian worldview and compassion for all plays a role in this type of assessment is not included.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
0.5 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5. 5: Excellent
0.5 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. 4: Good
0.46 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
3. 3: Satisfactory
0.44 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0.4 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
0.5 points
Criteria Description
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5. 5: Excellent
0.5 points
All format elements are correct.
4. 4: Good
0.46 points
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
3. 3: Satisfactory
0.44 points
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0.4 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Documentation of Sources
0.5 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
5. 5: Excellent
0.5 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
4. 4: Good
0.46 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
3. 3: Satisfactory
0.44 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0.4 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.